查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 大學聯招新制錄取大一學生聯考經驗及學習適應之研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳正勝; | 書刊名 | 輔導學報 |
卷 期 | 10 1987.03[民76.03] |
頁 次 | 頁223-266 |
分類號 | 525.611 |
關鍵詞 | 大學聯招; 適應; 學生; 學習; 聯考; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究係以七十三學年度大學新制聯招,經錄取分發各大學就讀之一年級學生為研究對象。經由各大學之隨機取樣,得樣本男生318人,女生300人。以其在「大學聯招新制錄取大一學生的聯考經驗及學習適應之調查問卷」各題上之反應,分析大一學生之聯考經驗及學習適應情形,並探究其學習滿意狀況及留校留系的意願。調查結果發現: (1) 大一學生在聯考前雖面對新制的強大壓力,但因其對新制了解不多,且了解動機比想像中低,因此所造成之壓力與焦慮並不如想像中強。(2) 由於新制的規定繁瑣,且距考試時間不遠,雖新制之規定影響深遠,但仍有許多考生依舊抱著「考上再說」的心理。(3) 教師本身對新制聯招的了解不足、影響了輔導學生的意願,成為學生了解意顧不高的原因。(4) 跨組報考的學生並不踴躍,但跨組報考錄取比例則顯著提高。(5) 考生對報考類組及填選志顧自主力強,但從其滿意度看,無法證明其有真正的自主能力。(6) 填選志願能考慮自己的需要,各系錄取分數排名的意義降低。(7) 就讀系組與願望、理想間仍有差距。(8) 出路及功課壓力仍為大一學生之主要困擾。(9) 對所就讀之系組與將來的生涯計畫尚難發現關聯。(10)留系留校就讀意願比過去的研究資料所顯示者顯然提高,但仍為大一學生之重要關心課題。(11) 對大學教育內容、目標尚未明晰。(12) 高中的輔導工作對升學輔導和大一的學習適應關係不大。根據以上之發現,提出下列建議: (1) 簡化新制規定,促使考生願意深入了解;(2) 研修四大類組之結構與跨組規定,以實現甄材之理想;(3) 加強宣導先考試後填志願的目的,以實現適性教育之理想;(4) 加強高中升學輔導措施,以教師充分了解新制為前提;(5) 加強大學新生入學輔導的功能,建立生計教育的觀念;(6) 充實大學輔導機構,辦理多樣化的輔導設施,協助學生適應;(7) 加強大一學生之導師功能,發揮學術領導的效果,以奠定其學術生活的基礎。 |
英文摘要 | This study aimed to investigate the college entrance examination experience and the learning adjustment of the college freshmen admitted by the New Joint College Entrance Examination (Neo-JCEE) System, together with their intentions to stay at their department/college, by means of analyzing the responses to "The Questionnaire for Surveying the Joint College Entrance Examination Experience and Learning Adjustment of the College Freshmen Admitted by the Neo-JCEE System". Subjects ( 318 boy-students and 300 girl-students) were randomly selected from different colleges' freshmen admitted by the Neo-JECC System. Major findings included: 1) Under the heavy pressure of NeoJCEE System prior to the entrance examination, the respondents did not have as much pressure and anxiety as expected, partly because they did not fully understand the new system and partly because their motivation to understand the system was lower than expected; 2) due to the complicated regulations of the Neo-JCEE System, and being too close to the examination dates, many respondents still kept a "Let-It-Be" philosophy, even though the regulations of the new system had profound influence on the testees; 3) senior high school teachers did not sufficiently understand the Neo-JCEE System, which influenced their intentions to guide students, causing the low intentions of students to understand the Neo-JCEE system; 4) Cross-section registered testees were not too many, but those testees who made crosssection registration had more opportunities to get admitted; 5) testees had strong self-determination to select which sections to take and which forms to fill up, but judging from the degree of satisfaction, no one could prove that they really had selfdetermination capacity; 6) selecting and filling in free choices can take testees' own needs into consideration, and college departmental rankings based upon entrance examination scores became less meaningful; (7) there were still gaps between departments in which the testees were admitted, intentions, and ideals; 8) Both future career and homework pressure still were two major factors disturbing college freshmen; 9) no relationship could be found between respondents' future career plan and the department they are in; 10) intentions to stay at the department/ school were higher than those showed in previous research findings, but these intentions were still one of the major concerns of college freshmen; 11) respondents were still not familiar with the content and the objectives of college education; 12) the relationship between college entrance examination guidance at senior high schools and guidance for college freshmen's learning adjustment was weak. Basing upon the above findings, we suggested: 1) to simplify the regulations of the Neo-JCEE System so as to let testees understand the System more profoundly; 2) to revise the structure of the four major alternative sections and cross-section registration in order to implement the ideals of selecting best students; 3) to enhance propogating the purposes of the "FirstTaking-The-Examination And-Then-Filling-In-Free-Choices" measure, in order to actualize the ideals of aptitude-oriented education; 4) to strengthen entrance examination guidance measures for senior high school students, on the premise of making senior high school teachers fully understand the Neo-JCEE System; 5) to enforce the functions of college freshmen orientation guidance upon entrance, in order to establish the ideas of career education; 6) to better equip college guidance facilities, for implementing multi-functional guidance measures to help students adapt themselves to college life; and 7) to enforce the functions of college freshmen academic advisors to enlarge the effects of academic leadership, in order to lay the foundations of college freshmen's academic life. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。