查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Second Language Learning Theory and Constructivism: The Comparisons and Application
- 建構取向的科學教室內師生互動實例
- 電子佈告欄輔助歷史教學--以中國歷史專題討論課程為例
- WWW上智慧型合作學習環境之研究:一個全球氣候歸納探索學習環境
- 建構主義理論與教學實證研究
- 建構與解構-掙脫建構主義的桎梏
- 藉反省式教學方式探究師院生的自然科教學觀
- U.S.-China Nonproliferation Cooperation: Debacle or Success﹖ A Constructivist/Neorealist Debate
- 教學模擬之意涵與設計模式
- 建構主義的教學評析
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Second Language Learning Theory and Constructivism: The Comparisons and Application=第二外國語學習理論與建構主義的比較和應用 |
---|---|
作 者 | 林靜憶; | 書刊名 | 大仁學報 |
卷 期 | 18 2000.05[民89.05] |
頁 次 | 頁293-305 |
分類號 | 800.33 |
關鍵詞 | 第二外國語學習理論; 建構主義; 電腦輔助語言學習; Second language learning theory; Constructivism; CALL; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | Semour Papert所著”Mindstorms: Children, Compputers and Powerful Ideas” (1980)一書引起眾人對學習本質的興趣與討論。Papert於書中討論現代科技,特別是電腦輔助教學在自然學科學習的運用;然而,對於電腦助教學在人文社會學科,特吸是語言學習的應用,卻著墨甚微。因此,本文將對基本的電腦應用理論及語言學習的理論觀點,詳加研討,期將電腦中助教學應用於人文學科中的語言學習,做一個完整的連結。首先,本文分析討論Papert著書觀點的基本理論—建構主義(Constructivism)與由語言學習觀點發展出來的第二外國語學習理論(Second Language Learning Theory)的異同處;即對建構主義與第二外國語學習理論中重要的議題—經驗(experience)和輸入(input)所扮演的角色、學習(learning)和獲得(acquisition)、主動學習者(active learner)和學習動機(motivation)及電腦輔助語言學習(Computer Assisted Language Learning)和Cognitive Apprenticeship等主題做更具體的比較。綜上研討結果,作者確信Papert震撼人心的電輔助教學理論可以應用在第二外國語言學習上,就如Papert書中所舉利用電腦科技學習教學成功的例子一樣。 |
英文摘要 | Seymour Papert’s book Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas (1980) stirred people’s attention to the nature of learning. Papert discussed how technology, particularly computer, could be applied to the sciences in his work. However, he less mentioned the application to humane studies, such as language learning. Therefore in this study, in order to connect computer application to the humanities, especially language learning, basic computer application theory and language learning concept were put forward. First of all, the similarities and differences between Papert’s original fundamental theory-constructivism and second language learning theory from language learning perspective were discussed. Then the following points were also stressed on: the roles Experience and Input played in both theories; the differences between Acquisition and Learning; Active Learners and Motivation; how CALL implemented Cognitive Apprenticeship. By analyzing and comparing characteristics of language learning and constructivism on which Papert’s proposals had been based, the writer strongly believed the great possibilities of combining language learning and Papert’s powerful ideas; second language learning theory and constructivism could be combined as closely as math learning and computer had done in Papert’s book. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。