查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 英國國民教育改革之學校課程實驗評析
- Educational Reform Act-Based Curriculum Innovation: An English Experience of National Curriculum Reform
- 課程發展之行動研究:以國立中正大學教育學程之課程發展為例
- Research Based Curriculum Development in the Secondary School:A British Experience in Curriculum Innovation
- Experiment-Based Curriculum Development in Social Studies: A Curriculum Reform Experience in Taiwan
- 行動研究與學校教育革新
- 多元文化課程評鑑的量化途徑
- 職業學校新課程評鑑模式初探
- 由「教師即研究者」的英國教育改革理念論教師的課程決定
- 我國國民中小學學校層次德育課程評鑑指標之建構
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 英國國民教育改革之學校課程實驗評析=Compulsory School Curriculum Experiment in the United Kingdom |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡清田; | 書刊名 | 國民教育研究學報 |
卷 期 | 5 1999.06[民88.06] |
頁 次 | 頁179-198 |
分類號 | 526.1941 |
關鍵詞 | 教室即課程實驗室; 課程行動研究; 課程革新; 課程實驗; 課程評鑑; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文旨在分析英國國民教育改茁之學校課程貿驗目的、原理與設計,並就此課程 實驗加以討論與評議,指出其對我國進行國民教育九年一貫課程改革的啟示。作 者以英國「人文課程方案」的課程實驗為例,指出教師在課程計畫小組與評鑑小 組等「課程改革之推動者」指導之下,進行課程的選擇組織發展與不斷進行教學 反省回饋之革新動態歷程,其課程實驗不只是測試適合的教材教法,更在於課程 理念之研究發展實驗與行動實踐。 在課程實驗過程中,教師置身於教室實驗室情境,承擔「教師即研究者」責任, 將課程視為「研究假設」,並將教學視同進行課程實驗過程,考驗教室課程實驗測 試結果,強調反省批判能力,俾使教學歷程能有效協助學生學習。其課程實驗設 計,包括「教示室即課程實驗室」「課程即研究假設」、「教師即研究者」與「經由 評鑑改進課程」,對我國的國民教育課程改革,深具啟發價值。 |
英文摘要 | The Humanities Curriculum Project in the United Kingdom was a famous curriculum experiment project for its aims, rationale and experimental design. It was initiated by the central government in England i.e. the Schools Council for Curriculum and Examinations at the Department of Education who employed curriculum change agent to act as Curriculum Project Team and Evaluation Team to inspire teachers to conduct the experimentation in the classroom context. The author first illustrates the essential curriculum concepts in this experiment project i.e. classroom as curriculum laboratory, curriculum as hypothesis teacher as researcher and wholeness-based curriculum evaluation. The author explains that the curriculum in this project was treated as an innovative pedagogical experiment, whereas the teacher as experimental innovators. In particular, nine themes were chosen as areas of inquiry in teaching and learning. The Project Team didn't write textbooks, but produced multi-media collections of study material and teacher guides in each theme: they also used film and printed material as evidence to support discussion. Teachers acted as procedurally neutral chairmen to help students to inquire through evidence from the collection to support research-based, teaching teachers had the responsibility to protect divergence of view. Finally .the author offers some critical observations on this project as an approach to curriculum experimentation. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。