查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 山地原住民的成績比平地原住民差嗎?可能影響臺東縣原住民各族與漢人國小學生學業成績差異的因素機制
- 立委選舉原住民參選人的背景分析 (1972~2008 年)
- 臺灣原住民的選舉研究史及其評估
- 新北市原住民族社會資源利用現況分析
- 臺灣法律史在司法違憲審查上之運用--以西拉雅族原住民身分認定案為例
- Prevalence and Treatment of Pediculus Capitis Infestation among Aboriginal School Children in Northern Taiwan
- 高雄中學不同方式入學生學業成績比較--八十五學年度一年級學生
- 不同方式入學的高中學生學業成績與身心健康之比較研究--自學方案分發、高中聯考及數理資優甄選
- 近朱者赤﹖近墨者黑﹖:青少年初期同儕團體的形成與影響
- 族群及家庭背景對學業成績之影響模式--以臺東縣原、漢學童作比較
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 山地原住民的成績比平地原住民差嗎?可能影響臺東縣原住民各族與漢人國小學生學業成績差異的因素機制=Are the Achievements of Mountain Indigenous Students Lower than Those of Plain Indigenous Ones? The Possible Mechanisms of Academic Achievement Gap among the Indigenous Tribes and the Han Elementary School Students in Taitung |
---|---|
作 者 | 巫有鎰; 黃毅志; | 書刊名 | 臺灣教育社會學研究 |
卷 期 | 9:1 2009.06[民98.06] |
頁 次 | 頁41-89 |
分類號 | 529.47 |
關鍵詞 | 山地原住民; 平地原住民; 學業成績; Mountain indigenous students; Plain indigenous students; Academic achievement; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 過去國內的教育研究由於原住民樣本數不足,大多將原住民併為一類與漢人做比較。本研究運用「臺東縣教育長期資料庫」的六年級學生及其家長、教師與校長普查資料做分析,涵蓋足夠的原住民樣本,可分別就臺東縣六族原住民與漢人的成績做比較,以釐清原住民各族與漢人的成績差異及造成差異的可能因素機制。研究發現,臺東原住民各族成績均比漢人低許多,特別是平地原住民,而非一般認為的山地原住民,其中,學生人數最多的阿美成績很低,僅高於人數最少的達悟;阿美成績低落是造成整體原住民成績不如漢人的最主要原因,其不利因素除父母社經地位較低、不完整家庭比率較高外,「負面文化」較多也是原因。原住民中成績較高的反而是山地原住民,如布農因學校財務資本較高,而提高成績。 |
英文摘要 | The majority of studies in the past have failed to include sufficient indigenous samples to enrich analysis, or the indigenous samples were lumped together to compare or contrast with the non-indigenous samples. The study uses the database of Taiwan Taitung Educational Panel Survey, including data from sixth graders, their parents, teachers, and principals. The abundant indigenous samples in the database are beneficial to compare the school and non-school factors resulting in the achievement gaps between students from the six indigenous tribes and the Hans in Taitung. Results indicate that the achievements of any indigenous students are significantly below those of the Han students, especially in the case of plain indigenous students, not mountain indigenous ones as we usually think of, and factors resulting in the gaps are explored. The Amis, who live in the plain areas, has the largest population among the indigenous students, but has next to the lowest average in achievement scores, only higher than the Dawu, who has the fewest population. The low achievement of the Amis students is the main factor for achievement gap between the indigenous students and the Hans. The factors affecting the low achievement of the Amis are attributed to the lower SES, the high percentage of the broken family structure, more “negative cultures.” The Bunun, who live in the mountain villages, produce higher average achievement scores than the other indigenous students. The causal effects are found in the fact that the Bunun students have higher financial resources in school. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。