頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 足球運動不同位置球員間體型及體能之比較= |
---|---|
作者 | 姚東生; |
期刊 | 華夏學報 |
出版日期 | 19951200 |
卷期 | 29 1995.12[民84.12] |
頁次 | 頁11787-11811 |
分類號 | 994.41 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 足球; 球員; |
中文摘要 | 本研究的目的乃在評量五專男子組足球隊在前鋒、中場、後衛及守門員等四個不 同位置組,球員與球員間體型及體能上的差異。受試對象為華夏工商專校五專男子足球隊二 十名球員,經研究分析得下列結果: 一、全體球員在身詗體重等體型特徵方面與國代表隊(1985)間並無明顯差異;在體能方面 四位置組球員間之差異皆未達顯著性水準。 二、在身體特徵方面,守門員及後衛之身材均較中場及前鋒為佳,偏高大粗壯。 三、在體型方面,唯身高達顯著性水準(F=6.55, P<.05),並經 Scheff'e 法事後比較, 前鋒及後衛達顯著差異(F=11.82,P<.05)。 四、守門員在肌力、動力、敏捷性、腹肌耐力及速度上皆高於其他三位置組球員。 五、前鋒在握力、背肌力、動力、敏捷性、柔軟度項目均遜於其他三位置組球員。 六、柔軟度方面以後衛最佳。 七、心耐力方面則以中場最佳,後衛最差,全體平均值明顯低於其他較高水準球隊。 |
英文摘要 | This is a comparison project to comment the differences of Physical Appearance and Physical Fitness Level of the junior college male football players at their different positions as forwards, halfbacks, fullbacks and goalkeeps. Twenty healthy male junior college football players of the Hwa-Hsia Industrial and Commercial College were used as subjects for this project. The project has obtained the fallowing seven conclusions: 1.Comparing the Physical Appearance such as the height and weight, there was no significant differences between the junior college players and the National Repressentative Players. For all of the Physical Fitness Level, the different characteristics of the four positions didn't reach the significant standard. 2.The goalkeepers and fullbacks had longer and stronger body than the halfbacks and forwards. 3.In respect to the Physical Appearance, only the height of the players reached the significant standard. (f=6.55, P<.05) According to the Scheff'e Method Comparison, there was a significant difference between the forwards and fulbacks. (F=11.82 , P<.05) 4.The goalkeeps were superior than the other three groups in muscular stregth, motor ability, agility, abdomomenal endurance and speed. 5.The forwards were inferior than the other three groups in grip strength, muscular strength, motor ability, agility, fexibility and speed. 6.With regard to the fexibility, the fullbacks were the best. 7.The halfbacks were the best and the fullbacks were the worst in comparison with their lungs endurance. The average value of the team was inferior than the other high standard teams. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。