查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 重構信仰與知識的同源共生關係:Jürgen Habermas的後形上學思維的系譜學觀點=Reconstructing the Homologous and Symbiotic Relationship between Faith and Knowledge: Jürgen Habermas' Genealogical Perspective on Post-metaphysical Thinking |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 周明泉; | 書刊名 | 政治與社會哲學評論 |
| 卷 期 | 83 2025.12[民114.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁73-128 |
| 分類號 | 210.111 |
| 關鍵詞 | 理性自由; 信仰與知識; 後形上學的; 後世俗的; 系譜學; Rational freedom; Faith and knowledge; Postmetaphysical; Post-secular; Genealogy; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.6523/SOCIETAS.202512_(83).0002 |
| 中文摘要 | 於本文中,筆者主要探究Habermas(哈伯馬斯)如何以後形上學思維的系譜學方法,重構信仰與知識的同源共生關係。首先,筆者將處理為何Habermas選擇信仰與知識這組關鍵概念作為鋪陳其宗教思想的主導性概念。其次,將闡釋為何我們在近代面臨後形上學思維的十字路口,必須在Hume或Kant之間做出選擇。再則,將剖析Habermas為何將哲學史視為一種後形上學思維系譜學式的學習過程。最後,筆者將針對Habermas在《也是一部哲學史》(AGP)一書中所展現出的傑出研究成果,進行批判性的反思,並提出四點值得商榷的問題,即:是否在AGP一書中避談崩解歷史?我們在Hume與Kant之外沒有第三種選擇嗎?宗教語言轉譯成公共語言沒有不可共量性的問題?理性自由光靠激勵與賦權是否足夠? |
| 英文摘要 | In this paper, I mainly explore how Habermas reconstructed the homologous and symbiotic relationship between faith and knowledge through a genealogical method of post-metaphysical thinking. Firstly, I will deal with why Habermas chooses the key concepts of faith and knowledge as the dominant concepts to elaborate on his religious thought. Secondly, I will explain why we have to choose between Hume or Kant when we are facing the crossroads of post-morphological thinking in modern times. Furthermore, I will analyze why Habermas regards the history of philosophy as a learning process in the style of genealogical post-metaphysical thinking, and how he addresses faith and knowledge through this genealogical method. Finally, I will critically reflect on the outstanding research results presented by Habermas in the book "Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie" (AGP) and raise four points worthy of discussion: Is there a tendency to avoid discussing the history of dissolution in AGP? We don't have a third option outside of Hume and Kant? Are there issues regarding the incommensurability of translating religious language into public language? Is rational freedom sufficient solely through motivation and empowerment? |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。