查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 中西哲學理論對比研究之省思--以《莊子》對比冥契主義為例
- 論《阿含經》與《莊子》於「命觀」之相通處
- How to Do Chinese Philosophy in a Western Philosophical Context: Introducing a Unique Approach to Chinese Philosophy
- 未始出吾宗:論莊子之冥契主義的類型問題
- 道家的自然體驗與冥契主義--神秘.悖論.自然.倫理
- 神話.變形.冥契.隱喻--老莊的肉身之道與隱喻之道
- 論道家的逍遙美學--與羅蘭.巴特的「懶惰哲學」之對話
- 大陸近五十年來的莊子研究
- 唐君毅對於孟子思維方式和表達特色的契會與詮釋
- 莊子內外雜篇之形成及其先後問題
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 中西哲學理論對比研究之省思--以《莊子》對比冥契主義為例=Thoughts on the Comparative Studies of Chinese and Western Philosophies--Taking the Contrast between Zhuangzi and Mysticism as an Example |
---|---|
作 者 | 林修德; | 書刊名 | 臺北教育大學語文集刊 |
卷 期 | 44 2023.12[民112.12] |
頁 次 | 頁1-27 |
分類號 | 121.33 |
關鍵詞 | 比較哲學; 莊子; 冥契主義; 研究關懷; Comparative philosophy; Zhuangzi; Mysticism; Research concerns; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文以關永中與楊儒賓對於「《莊子》思想是否為冥契主義」的論斷 分歧為例,反省當代中西哲學理論對比研究之模式。哲學研究通常奠基 於文本解讀研究,而中西文化語言本質不同,以至於批評者認為中西哲 學之間的理論對比研究,因文本語言差異而無法進行,然筆者認為文本 僅是人類哲學思維活動下的產物,而非哲學思維活動本身,「人的思維活 動」才是哲學研究的主要對象。若我們重新確立學界共通的研究關懷網絡,學術立場的衝突可能得以透過不同層級的研究關懷之關係而化解, 因此在關注「人類共通哲學思維活動」的研究關懷下,當代中西哲學理 論之間的對比研究,將可以在「探究跨文化哲學理論是否等同」的文本 解讀研究模式之外另闢蹊徑,轉而為「探究人類共通的哲學思維活動究 竟如何運作」的研究取向。 |
英文摘要 | Extending from Wing-chung Kwan’s and Rur-bin Yang’s disagreement on whether the thoughts of Zhuangzi are characteristic of mysticism, this study attempts to examine the contemporary comparative studies of Chinese and Western philosophies. Philosophical research is usually conducted on the basis of text interpretation; however, owing to the differences in nature of the Chinese and Western cultures and languages, some critics argue that the comparative studies of Chinese and Western philosophical texts cannot be performed. Against this stance, I argue that philosophical texts are not so much thinking activity per se as products of human beings’ philosophical thinking. Thus, it is the thinking activity of human beings that should serve as the object of philosophical research. For this reason, if we map out the network of common concerns among researchers, the conflicts among different research positions will be resolved. With the spotlight cast upon the common philosophical thinking of human beings, a new approach to contemporary comparative studies of Chinese and Western philosophies can be developed, beyond the limitation of the mode of textual interpretation which centered in exploring whether philosophies of different cultural backgrounds can be treated as equivalent or not. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。