查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 菸害健康認知量表之發展與測試
- 門診病患對醫院滿意度與重視度之調查以臺灣地區區域醫院為例
- 從海難事件的發生論船員與船舶間互動效能的提昇
- WWW的使用瓶頸因素及使用者區隔探討--以北區大學傳播相關學系學生為例
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Factor Analysis Using the ECME Algorithm with Complete and Incomplete Data
- 中醫醫院門診病人選擇醫院之考慮因素及就醫滿意度研究--以臺中市七家中醫醫院為例
- 臺灣地區花卉批發市場服務品質構成因素及其衡量之研究: 從承銷人的觀點
- 多變量分析應用在乾燥中心燃油效率分析
- 臺灣木構造房屋建築市場現況調查分析
- 工作限制對國小學童投擲動作型式的影響
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 菸害健康認知量表之發展與測試=Developing and Testing a Tobacco Harm to Health Cognition Scale |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳杏雯; 葉美玲; | 書刊名 | 榮總護理 |
卷 期 | 34:2 2017.06[民106.06] |
頁 次 | 頁179-187 |
分類號 | 411.84 |
關鍵詞 | 菸害健康認知量表; 生理認知; 心理認知; 因素分析; Tobacco harm to health cognition scale; THHCS; Physical cognition; Psychological cognition; Factor analysis; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 菸害衛教是防治菸害最常見介入措施,針對衛教內容進行評值,可瞭解衛教成效。本研究目的為發展與測試菸害健康認知量表;第一階段為建構菸害健康認知量表並檢定內容效度。第二階段針對未吸菸者及吸菸者施測,並進行探索性因素分析以檢定量表效度。本研究通過北部某區域醫院倫理審查委員會核可,經方便取樣,針對該院內外科住院病人進行調查,共140 位未吸菸者及249 位吸菸者完成問卷。菸害健康認知量表共計22 題。以未吸菸者資料萃取出三個因素,分別是生理認知- 記憶性、理解性及心理認知,可解釋總變異量為52.13%。而吸菸者資料萃取出四因素,分別是生理認知- 記憶性、理解性、應用性及心理認知,可解釋總變異量為50.87%。菸害健康認知量表可適用於評量未吸菸者與吸菸者之菸害衛教後之菸害認知。其中生理認知次量表歸類因素不盡相同,但可區辨未吸菸者及吸菸者間之認知差異性,以作為菸害防治工作之參考。 |
英文摘要 | Health education regarding the harms of tobacco use is essential for preventing tobacco-related health problems. The health education content of a test was analyzed to establish the results and effectiveness of health education. The aim of this study was to develop a tobacco harm to health cognitive scale (THHCS). In the first phase of the construction of the THHCS, the content validity was tested. The second phase involved nonsmokers and smokers being administered the test. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was applied to detect the validity of the scale. This study was approved by the ethics institutional review board of the study hospital. Convenience sampling was used. A total of 140 nonsmoking and 249 smoking inpatients completed the questionnaire in the medical and surgical wards of the study hospital. The THHCS comprised 22 questions. The EFA of nonsmokers involved extracting three factors, namely physiological cognition, memory/ comprehension, and psychological cognition; the total explanatory variation was 52.13%. The EFA of smokers involved extracting four factors, namely physiological cognition, memory/ comprehension/application, and psychological cognition; the total explanatory variation was 50.87%. The THHCS can be applied to both nonsmokers and smokers after tobacco harm education for tobacco harm prevention. "Physiological perception" had different subscales for nonsmokers and smokers; therefore, the scoring scale required consideration of whether users were nonsmokers or smokers. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。