查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Efficacy of Laser-Assisted Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
- 雷射耳穴治療脊髓損傷患者疼痛的立即效果
- Fabrication processes for an AlGaAs/InGaP/AlGaAs Visible LD Grown by Liquid phase Epitaxy
- 以聲門上高頻率噴氣式換氣來執行雷射喉顯微手術
- 早期聲門癌以內視鏡二氧化碳雷射顯微手術治療的長期追蹤結果
- 雷射修整機在厚膜電阻修整上的應用
- Ureteroscopic Diagnosis and Management of Upper Urinary Tract Neoplasm--Clinical Experience in Veterans General Hospital-Taipei
- Evaluation of the Pain-Relieving Effect of Carbamazepine (Tegretol[feb9]) during Panretinal Photocoagulation
- 二氧化碳雷射燻煙的初步調查報告及安全防護
- 全球雷射暨光感測器產業概況
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Efficacy of Laser-Assisted Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection=雷射輔助精子顯微注射的效用 |
---|---|
作 者 | 林禹宏; 黃建榮; 謝碧純; 黃詩嘉; 陳靜玉; 陳培欣; | 書刊名 | 輔仁醫學期刊 |
卷 期 | 4:3 民95.09 |
頁 次 | 頁139-143 |
分類號 | 415.8616 |
關鍵詞 | 卵質內精子顯微注射; 紡錘絲; 雷射; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Spindle; Laser; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 目的:傳統的卵質內精子顯微注射可能會傷害到紡錘絲,本研究的目的是探討一種改良式的精子顯微注射是否能改善預後。方法:本研究包括20位患有男性不孕症且準備接受精子顯微注射的夫婦。成熟的卵子分別接受傳統的卵質內精子顯微注射或改良式的精子顯微注射。改良式的雷射輔助精子顯微注射是先用雷射在遠離極體的透明帶打一個洞,再從這個洞將精子注入卵子,比較兩組的受精率、受損率、及胚胎分裂。結果:從20位婦女共得到342顆成熟卵子,其中165顆以雷射輔助精子顯微注射受精,177顆以傳統的精子顯微注射受精。受精率、受損率、及胚胎分裂率在雷射輔助精子顯微注射受精這一組分別是84.8%,3.0%,91.4%,在傳統的精子顯微注射這一組分別是87.6%,4.0%,and 89.7%。都沒有顯著意義。結論:雷射輔助精子顯微注射並不比傳統的精子顯微注射好。 |
英文摘要 | Background and Purpose: Traditional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) might damage the spindles. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a modified ICSI procedure can improve the outcome of ICSI. Methods: Twenty couples with male-factor infertility who were going to undergo ICSI were enrolled in the study. Mature oocytes from every woman were randomized for fertilization by conventional ICSI or a modified, laser-assisted ICSI. The laser-assisted ICSI was performed by making a hole in the zona pellucida away from the polar body with a laser, then performing ICSI through the hole. The fertilization, damage, and embryo cleavage rates were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Altogether, 342 metaphase Ⅱ oocytes were obtained from the 20 women. Among them, 165 oocytes were treated by laser-assisted ICSI, and 177 by conventional ICSI. The fertilization, damage, and cleavage rates in the laser-assisted group were 84.8%, 3.0%, and 91.4%, and were 87.6%, 4.0%, and 89.7%, respectively, in the conventional ICSI group. All comparisons were non-significant. Conclusion: We concluded that laser-assisted ICSI is no better than conventional ICSI. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。