查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 網路多元學生出題策略對國小學生認知策略與學習成就之影響
- 高一學生認知風格、認知策略與遺傳學學習成就的關係
- 網路學生出題策略應用於國小古典詩課程其成效之研究
- 技能導向與概念導向的教學方式對體育科學習成就之影響
- 認知風格、認知策略、遺傳學知識與遺傳學解題之研究
- Cadets' Learning Behaviors and English Achievement--A Case Study of the Armed Forces Academies in Taiwan
- 專科生英語成就的累積機率邏輯模型之建立
- 醫管科會計課程學習成就預測模式之建立與研究--以中華醫專為例
- 科學史對高中學生學習成就之影響
- 以CAL探究低學習成就學生共價鍵概念結構改變之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 網路多元學生出題策略對國小學生認知策略與學習成就之影響=Effects of Online Student Question-Generation with Multiple Procedural Guides for Elementary Students' Use of Cognitive Strategies and Academic Achievement |
---|---|
作 者 | 于富雲; 賴奕嬛; | 書刊名 | 教育資料與圖書館學 |
卷 期 | 51:4 2014.夏[民103.夏] |
頁 次 | 頁525-560 |
分類號 | 521.12 |
關鍵詞 | 認知策略; 網路學習系統; 學生出題策略; 學習成就; Academic achievement; Online learning system; Student question-generation; Use of cognitive strategies; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 考量不同學生出題策略在明確度、難度與學科單元適用性上各有不同,而現有研究皆鎖定單一學生出題策略學習成效之探討,本研究旨在探討網路多元學生出題策略配合國小學科教學對認知策略與學習成就的影響。本研究選定國語科和自然科,採前後測控制組準實驗研究法,以南部一所國小五年級二個班級學生為樣本,採用具出題鷹架設計的線上學生出題系統,進行八週的實驗教學活動。資料以單因子共變數分析發現:多元學生出題策略組對國小國語科與自然科認知策略運用有顯著優於傳統自習組的影響;另,相對於傳統自習組,多元學生出題策略組有較佳的國語科與自然科學習成就表現,唯差異未達顯著水準。文末,根據研究結果與發現提出教學實施及未來研究建議。 |
英文摘要 | Student question-generation (SQG) procedural guides differ in terms of level of concreteness, demands on cognitive skills and appropriateness for respective instructional units. Because existing studies exclusively examine the effects of individual guides, this study was aimed at an investigation of the effects of online SQG with multiple guides intended to promote elementary students' use of cognitive strategies and to improve academic performance while learning Chinese and science. A quasi-experimental research method and an online learning system with dynamic scaffolding designs were adopted to support student learning of Chinese and science via the SQG approach. Two fifth-grade classes (N=56) participated for eight weeks. Twice per week, in accordance with the instructors' schedules, students engaged in online SQG or self-study activities in their randomly assigned groups. The results of the analysis of covariance indicated significant differences between the two treatment groups in their use of cognitive strategies while learning Chinese and science, with students in the SQG group scoring significantly higher than those in the comparison group. However, academic achievement between the two groups did not differ significantly. Suggestions for instructional implementations and future studies are provided. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。