查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- An Approximation to Secondary Predication Structure: A Case of V-qilai in Mandarin Chinese
- From 'Direction' to 'Positive Evaluation': On the Grammaticalization, Subjectification and Intersubjectification of Faan1 'Return' in Cantonese
- 論客家話「好X」格式的語法化和主觀化
- 從“總括”義到“估計、推測”義--以“估測”義副詞“總”的語法化為例
- 臺灣客語「怕」之情態演變--語法化與主觀化之觀點
- 臺、華語語言接觸下的「有」字句
- Inclusion of the Outsider--Grammaticalization of the Verbal Particle Maai in Cantonese
- 臺灣閩南語準句末助詞「去」的歷時語意發展
- 論中古佛經「已」字語法功能之發展與演變
- Subjectification and the Use of the Complementizer SHUO
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | An Approximation to Secondary Predication Structure: A Case of V-qilai in Mandarin Chinese=近似次級謂語結構:以漢語「V-起來」為例 |
---|---|
作 者 | 徐淑瑛; 王萸芳; 林志傑; | 書刊名 | 語言暨語言學 |
卷 期 | 14:4 2013.07[民102.07] |
頁 次 | 頁701-736 |
分類號 | 802.632 |
關鍵詞 | 次級謂語; 啟動詞素; 描述性補語; 結果補語; 提升結構; 語法化; 主觀化; Secondary predication; Inchoative morpheme; Descriptive complement; Resultative complement; Raising construction; Grammaticalization; Subjectification; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究重新考察漢語中廣被探討的「V-起來」結構。本文首先將「V-起來+謂語」的結構與動詞「起來」並作為啟動詞素「-起來」加以區別,乃因後兩者並無選擇補語。之後依照「V-起來」所選擇之補語歸納出三種「V-起來+謂語」句型:(一)描述性補語、(二) 賓語取向的描述謂語、(三)子句(提升結構),並提出統一的次級謂語結構來總括此三類補語。再者,本文檢視台灣中央研究院現代漢語平衡語料庫,與近代漢語標記語料庫所出現的「V-起來」,依據上述加以分類。結果顯示,典型動詞或啟動詞素「-起來」的出現頻率遠大於「V-起來+謂語」。此現象表示,此三類謂語不應視為特殊的結構,而為正在形成的結構。而此語法化的過程,因經濟原則,採用了漢語現成的次級謂語結構。本文的分析也佐證了歷時演進之語法化與主觀化現象。 |
英文摘要 | This study re-examines the widely studied V-qilai 'rise-come' construction in Mandarin Chinese. It first distinguishes V-qilai + predicate construction from the lexical verb qilai and -qilai as a lexical inchoative morpheme, which do not require an additional complement. In addition, three variations of the V-qilai + predicate pattern are identified according to the complement functions: namely (i) a descriptive complement, (ii) an object-oriented descriptive predicate, and (iii) a proposition clause (raising construction). These three variants are subsumed under and accounted for by the proposed uniformed secondary predication structure, while vary with their respective complement structures. In addition, the occurrences of V-qilai were drawn from Academia Sinica Corpus. Based on the above classification, it is shown that there is a far greater preponderance of canonical qilai usages over the V-qilai + complement ones, indicating that the latter patterns are still emerging in the language. In the course of the development, they utilize the secondary predication structure. Hence, the variations of the V-qilai construction should not be treated as being construction specific or idiosyncratic. Thus, the proposed analysis provides a natural and well-motivated account in terms of economy. Moreover, synchronic cline of grammaticality can be correlated with grammaticalization and subjectification, as evidenced by the occurrences drawn from corpora of Modern and Early Mandarin Chinese. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。