頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 回應文=A Rejoinder |
---|---|
作 者 | 但昭偉; 蔡逸佩; | 書刊名 | 臺灣人權學刊 |
卷 期 | 1:1 2011.12[民100.12] |
頁 次 | 頁161-172 |
分類號 | 571.9 |
關鍵詞 | 人權理念; 儒家思想; 杜威; 人權教育; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在這篇回應中,我們將焦點放在兩個評論意見。一、我們的文章指出儒家經典中的思想與人權理念有契合之處,但評論者認為這論點的意義不大,而且忽略了中國歷來均未能建立人權保障機制的事實;第二個批評認為,杜威教育哲學中的民主與人權觀,在1949年前的中國與1949年後的台灣,其實並未發生實質的影響。針對這兩個批評,作者都舉證加以反駁,同時再次重申對台灣人權教育推動的樂觀期待。 |
英文摘要 | In this rejoinder, attention is particularly paid to two specific points. One is the criticism that to suggest the ideas (ideals) embedded in Confucian classics are compatible with the notion of human rights is of no significance, and that the authors ignore the fact that Chinese history has never established a system for protecting human rights. The other is the criticism that John Dewey’s philosophy of education, which incorporates notions of democracy and human rights, has never had real impact on the education of China (before 1949) and Taiwan (after 1949). The authors invoke arguments and evidences to refute these two criticisms, and defend their optimism about the promotion of human rights in Taiwan. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。