查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 著作自由作為著作人格權的憲法基礎=Freedom of Speech as the Constitutional Root of Moral Rights in Copyright Law |
---|---|
作者 | 陳仲嶙; Chen, Chung-lin; |
期刊 | 東海大學法學研究 |
出版日期 | 20110600 |
卷期 | 34 2011.06[民100.06] |
頁次 | 頁49-89 |
分類號 | 588.34 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 著作人格權; 著作自由; 言論自由; 違憲審查; 審查標準; 著作權法; Moral right; Freedom of speech; Freedom of expression; Judicial review; Standard of review; Copyright law; |
中文摘要 | 著作權因涵蓋在智慧財產權之下,通常被以財產權之性質加以理解。但基於法體系上人格權與財產權之區分,如將著作人格權之憲法基礎連結到財產權,將扞格不入,難圓其說。則著作人格權之憲法基礎為何?勢必須另尋他途。 本文主張,著作人格權之憲法基礎為著作自由,因為著作人格權所保護的標的,與言論自由的核心關切一致,可被涵蓋於言論自由保障的內涵中。同時,著作自由為自由權之一種而屬人格權之性質,與著作人格權的屬性相符,而不至於如引用財產權條款般發生齟齬。此一憲法基礎之釐清,非僅只理論上之意義,在違憲審查與制度設計等面向上亦將產生重要之影響。 |
英文摘要 | Although copyrights are often regarded as a branch of intellectual “property” rights, understanding moral rights in copyright law through the right of property causes discord in terms of the nature of rights. This article argues that moral rights are constitutionally grounded on the freedom of expression. The spirit of the freedom of expression centers on the self-control over one’s own expression. The content of moral rights is consistent with this core concern of the freedom of expression and can be covered by the realm of this constitutional right. Moreover, the freedom of expression and moral rights are both personality rights in nature and, therefore, associating moral rights with the freedom of expression poses no theoretical difficulty. This argument clarifying the constitutional basis of moral rights will significantly implicate and valuably contribute to the operation of judicial review and the construction of copyright legal scheme. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。