查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 新聞自由與競爭自由之利益衡量--以憲法學上「雙重標準說」為檢視之依據=The Balancing between Freedom of the Press and Freedom of Competition-Check It with the "Double Standard" Theory |
---|---|
作 者 | 紀振清; | 書刊名 | 公平交易季刊 |
卷 期 | 6:3 1998.07[民87.07] |
頁 次 | 頁1-36 |
分類號 | 891.1 |
關鍵詞 | 新聞自由; 競爭自由; 違憲審查; 雙重標準說; 思想之自由市場; 新聞媒體; 言論廣場; 優先地位說; 第四權理論; 利益衡量; 嚴格審查標準; 新干涉主義; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 當新聞自由與競爭自由發生利益衡量之問題時,該如何解決?由我國憲法規定,似乎找不到答案。是以,本文試圖依據雙重標準說加以評析之。雙重標準說係起源於美國的違憲審查論,以為對於有關表現自由之立法應加以嚴格審查,並演變為基本人權是否有優劣順序之討論。雖然,雙重標準說於美、日各國之學說及實務上,均尚未見定論,對於我國憲法理念之發展,則仍有重大參考之必要。 |
英文摘要 | It will be no answer from our Constitution about how to balancing the freedom of the press and the freedom of competition when they are in dispute over benefits for media. The purpose of this article is to critically analyze and introduce the "Double Standard" theory in order to check this problem. The origin of the "Double Standard" theory in American can be traced to the Carolene Products Case (1938), about the judicial review of governmental regulation. When it transplanted and developing in Japan, there are many discussions not only in the judicial review to deal with the constitutionality of governmental free speech regulation with stricter standards and with looser standards to economical regulation, but also in that whether it need to put the liberty rights of free speech to the preferred position or not. Though it is still at issue to date, no matter in American or in Japan, this article also suggests that the concept of the "Double Standard" theory should be conducive to the development of our Constitution. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。