查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- An Item Analysis of an English Achievement Test Taken by EFL College Students in Taiwan
- 21世紀的音樂教育(2):從「音樂實驗班教育」談音樂性向與成就測驗
- 成就測驗的性質與用途
- 成就測驗的種類
- 資訊融入學科教學研究--以網際網路多媒體教材輔助國小英語教學為例
- 上限水準的設定與測驗信度關係之研究
- Investigation of Test-takers' Views on Difficulty at Task Level: A Case Study of GEPT-Intermediate Spoken Performance
- 熱卡插補法應用於成就測驗不完整作答反應之推估研究
- 自然學科成就測驗的評量--馬里蘭州及臺灣學生學習成就評量計畫
- 電腦輔助音感教學成效研究
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | An Item Analysis of an English Achievement Test Taken by EFL College Students in Taiwan=臺灣大學生英語成就測驗之試題分析 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 施玉勉; | 書刊名 | 明道學術論壇 |
| 卷 期 | 6:3 2010.09[民99.09] |
| 頁 次 | 頁59-82 |
| 分類號 | 525.38051 |
| 關鍵詞 | 試題難易度; 試題鑑別度; 誘答選項分析; 成就測驗; Item facility; Item discrimination; Distractor analysis; Achievement test; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文是針對台灣的一所大學舉行的期中英語成就測驗作試題分析,評估試題在難易程度,鑑別力及誘答能力三方面的表現,並提出一些意見及建議。本文是從試題難易度,試題鑑別度及誘答選項分析三個方面作試題分析。研究議題包括(1)分析每個類型的題目是否太難,適中或太容易,(2)試題能否鑑別高分學生群和低分學生群在每個題目上的表現(3)誘答選項分析是否展現誤答的功能。誘答選項分析只針對選擇題型。本文也對學生做問卷調查,訪查對考試的感想和意見,結果顯示學生對考試的感想與實際分析的結果吻合,皆認為字彙最難. 整體研究顯示字彙測驗最難,也最有鑑別能力,聽力測驗較容易,聽力的誘答選項表現較差。試題分析的結果證明試題需作一些修正。作者基於分析結果提出討論及建議,期待能改善成就測驗的品質,更有效地評估學生學習的成果。 |
| 英文摘要 | This study attempts to examine a mid-term English achievement test held in a university in Taiwan. Test items are analyzed, based on assessment devices such as Item Facility, Item Discrimination and Distractor Analysis, to evaluate if the test was appropriately administered in terms of level of difficulty, power of discrimination and function of distractors. Research issues include (1) whether items in four categories are easy or difficult for test takers; (2) whether items can discriminate the performance of top scorers and low scorers; and (3) whether distractors function well or badly. The result of a questionnaire indicates that about 60 percent of test takers think vocabulary is the most difficult category for them, which corresponds with the result of the study. Research findings have shown that vocabulary tests are the most difficult part of the whole test and exhibit the most powerful discrimination. A higher percentage of items in listening, reading, and grammar tests show little or no discrimination power. More nonsense distractors appear in listening tests. The outcome of the analysis suggests that the test needs to be revised. Suggestions are made to improve the quality of the achievement test in order to effectively measure students’ performance of learning. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。