查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 小學二年級數量推理與解題策略之跨文化研究
- 幼童數量知多少?不同族群幼童數量推理發展之研究
- 測量工具之翻譯與效度
- 文化脈絡中的積功德行為:以臺灣佛教慈濟功德會的參與者為例,兼論助人行為的跨文化研究
- Introduction of the Evaluation of Sensory Processing and Its Translations for Use in Taiwan
- 教師的數學教學知識與其對兒童數學知識認知之探討
- Comparison Affective Dispositions Toward Critical Thinking Across Chinese and American Baccalaureate Nursing Students
- 臺加繪畫發展與審美評鑑跨文化研究
- 華人組織行為研究的方向與策略:由西化到本土化
- 《蒲團》的旅行:跨文化翻譯閱讀
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 小學二年級數量推理與解題策略之跨文化研究=The Quantitative Reasoning and the Problem-Solving Strategy of Second Grade Children in Cross-Cultural Research |
---|---|
作者 | 陳埩淑; Chen, Ching-shu; |
期刊 | 屏東教育大學學報 |
出版日期 | 20070300 |
卷期 | 26 2007.03[民96.03] |
頁次 | 頁649-672 |
分類號 | 523.32 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 數量概念; 數量大小; 跨文化研究; 兒童數學; Quantitative concept; Numerosity; Cross-cultural research; Child mathematics; |
中文摘要 | 本研究探討國小二年級兒童數量概念的發展與數量的推理能力,在研究設計中,以兩個階段的評量對兒童這些表現加以施測,第一階段以實物施測,經三個月之後,再以半具體的物件施測。為進一步瞭解兒童解決問題的歷程,施測過程中觀察兒童推理的策略,並在施測後對兒童進行訪談。 研究樣本取自台灣國小二年級及美國夏威夷州小學二年級學生,各地取二十名,另外,為瞭解二年級學生對辨識數量的策略是否與成人的方式相似,樣本還包含二十名成人。研究結果顯示,台灣和夏威夷兒童在實物評量的表現上,當兩個數量比例相近時,兒童的答對比率達到90%,反而在判斷半具體物件的數量時,兒童正確率降低,尤其當兒童比較兩組數量比例相近(5:6)時,兒童答對率低於65%。至於兒童在解題策略方面,發現二年級兒童答對百分之百的學生與答對百分之分成人的解題策略是相似的,他們不受物件間距效應影響,而答對90%學生,在辨識數量時,不受物件大小影響,卻受到間距效應的影響。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of the research is to explore the second graders’ concept of numerosity development and quantitative reasoning. For this purpose, there are two stages of trials for the children. The first trial is concrete objects. After three months, the children accepted the second trial of half concrete objects. However, to understand how the process of solving problems of children is necessary, the researcher observed how children used strategies to discriminate numerosity. After that the researcher interviewed students. The research sample came from second graders of Taiwanese and Hawaii Elementary schools. Each place had 20 students. In addition, in order to understand whether numerosity discrimination strategy in children was the same as adult’s or not? The sample included 20 adults. The result of the research showed that Taiwanese and Hawaiian children reached up to a 90% rate of correct answer in the trial of real objects. But in the trial of half concrete objects, the rate of correct answers was down to 65%, especially when children compared two quantities of 5:6 ratio. As for strategy, the strategies of the children who completed correct answers were the same as the adult who did whole correct answers. Because their discrimination was not influenced by distance effect, they could judge the numerosity correctly. However, the children who got 90% correction were impacted by distance effect but not influenced by the size of the object. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。