查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Comparison Affective Dispositions Toward Critical Thinking Across Chinese and American Baccalaureate Nursing Students
- 批判性思維與護理教學策略
- 辯論教學策略培育批判性思維
- 護理大學生之批判性思維情意特質
- 測量工具之翻譯與效度
- 文化脈絡中的積功德行為:以臺灣佛教慈濟功德會的參與者為例,兼論助人行為的跨文化研究
- Introduction of the Evaluation of Sensory Processing and Its Translations for Use in Taiwan
- Critical Thinking and Computer Based Systems
- 互動式影音電腦輔助教學教材之研發與測試
- 臺加繪畫發展與審美評鑑跨文化研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Comparison Affective Dispositions Toward Critical Thinking Across Chinese and American Baccalaureate Nursing Students=比較臺灣與美國大學護生之批判性思維情意特質 |
---|---|
作者 | 葉美玲; 陳興夏; | 書刊名 | The Journal of Nursing Research |
卷期 | 11:1 2003.03[民92.03] |
頁次 | 頁39-46 |
分類號 | 419.6 |
關鍵詞 | 情意特質; 批判性思維; 跨文化研究; Affective dispositions; Critical thinking; Cross-cultural study; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本跨文化研究旨在瞭解與比較臺灣與美國護理學生的批判性思維情意特質。本研究以方便取樣自臺灣與美國護理學院中,分別取得214與196位三、四年級的護理學生。"California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory" (CCTDI) 用於測量批判性思維之情意特質。本研究對象中,臺灣學生的年齡自19至28歲 (M = 22, SD = 1.87),而美國學生的年齡自20至51歲 (M = 28, SD = 6.08)。臺灣學生的七項情意特質皆於標準之上,除了尋求真理、系統性與成熟度三項特質以外。美國學生僅尋求真理特質低於標準,其他的特質皆達標準。臺灣與美國護生的每個次量表(特質)的項目平均值達統計上的顯著差異 [F(1, 408) = 54.11, p < .01],跨越次量表亦然 [F(6, 2448) = 905, p < .01]。其中尋求真理 [t(408) = 14.70, p < .001]、公正無私 [t(408) = 6.17, p < .001]、分析性 [t(408) = 4.73, p < .001]、成熟度 [t(408) = 10.46, p < .001] 等皆達統計上的顯著差異。此研究提供了相關資訊使之能瞭解臺灣與美國護理學生的批判性思維情意特質,其中的不同或許源自於文化、教與學習慣上的差異。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this cross-cultural study is to understand and compare affective dispositions toward critical thinking across Chinese and American cultures. Two convenience samples of 214 and 196 undergraduate nursing students were obtained in Taiwan and the USA, respectively. The California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory (CCTDI) was used to measure critical thinking dispositions. The ages of the students in these samples ranged from 19 to 28 (M = 22, SD = 1.87) for the Chinese sample, and from 20 to 51 (M = 28, SD = 6.08) for the American. For the Chinese sample, all means of the seven subscale scores were above 40, except for truth seeking, systematicity and maturity. For the American sample, all means of the seven subscale scores were above 40, except for truth seeking. The mean item responses for each subscale were significantly different between the two samples [F(1, 408) = 54.11, p < .01] and across the subscales [F(6, 2448) = 905, p < .01]. Significant differences between the two samples were also found in truth-seeking, t(408) = 14.70 (p < .001), open-mindedness, t(408) = 6.17 (p < .001), systematicity, t(408) = 4.73 (p < .001) and maturity, t(408) = 10.46 (p < .001). The findings provide information to understand affective dispositions toward critical thinking in either Chinese or American students. The differences may contribute to the cultural differences shown in their dispositions. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。