頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 資源有效利用原則作為違憲審查標準?--以釋字485號與釋字542號解釋為中心=The Principle of Efficient Use and Proper Allocation of Resources as the Standard for Judicial Review?--Focusing on Judicial Yuan's Interpretation No.485 and No.542 |
---|---|
作 者 | 羅承宗; | 書刊名 | 德明學報 |
卷 期 | 27 民95.06 |
頁 次 | 頁185-197 |
分類號 | 588.3 |
關鍵詞 | 比例原則; 平等原則; 資源有效運用原則; 違憲審查; Principle of equality; Principle of proportionality; The principle of efficient use and proper allocation of resources; Judicial review; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 司法院大法官於釋字485號與釋字第542號相繼提出「資源有效利用之原則」,作為給付立法行為所應遵循之法律原則。惟該原則內涵為何?是否具有作為違憲審查基準之可操作性?仍不無疑問。本文認為:上述兩號解釋仍以平等原則、比例原則做為釋憲之法理依據,大法官所謂「資源有效運用原則」毋寧是一個虛構、不具法學上可操作性的空洞概念,其本身並非可獨立操作的審查標準。 |
英文摘要 | According to Judical Yuan's Interpretation No.485 and No.542, all social policy legislations and administrative measures that grant benefits to the people, should be bound by the principle of efficient use and proper allocation of resources. But it's questionable whether this principle could be the operative standard for judicial review. After analyzing J. Y. Interpretation No.485 and No. 542, this paper finds that the Honorable Justices still take principle of equality and principle of proportionality as the standards to review the these two cases. In conclusion, this paper considers the principle of efficient use and proper allocation of resources is nothing more that an unoperative standard for judicial review. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。