查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論民事程序中之摸索證明=The "Ausforschungsbeweis" in Civil Procedure |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 姜世明; | 書刊名 | 成大法學 |
卷期 | 8 2004.12[民93.12] |
頁次 | 頁43-108 |
分類號 | 586.131 |
關鍵詞 | 證據; 舉證責任; 摸索證明; 證據調查; 舉證責任分配; 證據主題; Evidence; Burden of proof; Fishing expedition; Discover of evidence; Allocation of burden of proof; Theme of evidence; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 摸索證明是否應予禁止之問題,在德國法上之討論已由來已久;但在我國則較少被論及,即在實務上亦不見有判決直接使用「摸索證明」一詞者,對於此一制度之研究,可謂係我國民事訴訟法上尚待開發之領域。 所謂摸索證明主要係指證據聲明中之證據主題未予表明或表示不明確,而證據調查聲請人乃希冀藉由此次證據調查而獲得新主張之事實基礎或新證據方法。其中最具爭議問題乃對於應證事實乃基於推測而提出者,是否應區別舉證人有否提出適當根據以決定其准否? 摸索證明是否應予准許之問題,乃涉及應負舉證責任一造當事人之實體上權利及訴訟上之證明權與不負舉證責任一造當事人及第三人之自由權、名譽權、隱私權、營業秘密權等權利間之衝突與調協。其且與辯論主義、具體化義務、真實義務、訴訟促進及訴訟經濟之訴訟法基本要求、權利濫用禁止與誠信原則等在理論上有一定之緊張之關係。就此,在民事訴訟法學上究竟應為如何之理解,乃為本文探討之中心。 |
英文摘要 | Abstract Whether the “fishing expedition” ( Ausforschungsbeweis ) should be forbidden has been discussed in Germany for a long time. But in Taiwan it is seldom discussed both in the academic community and in practice. This is an area to be explored in Civil Procedure. The so-called “fishing expedition” mainly refers to the situations which the litigant does not specify the theme of the evidence, but wishes the court to find out. Then the litigant can raise new issues or make new claims based on the facts that the court has discovered through the “fishing expedition”. The most disputable issue is that if the litigant's request for the evidence investigation is based on suspicion, should the court ask the litigant to offer a proper basis before accepting his request? The issue of whether the “fishing expedition” should be accepted is involved with the conflict of rights between the plaintiff, the defendant and even the third party. It is also involved with many fundamental principles in the Civil Procedure. This paper is intended to explore these issues and then to design a system that allows the “fishing expedition” to be used logically and efficiently in Taiwan . |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。