查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Koto and a Culture of Difference: Musical Instruments and Performance Identity in Japan=日本箏與區分的文化:日本的樂器與演奏認同 |
---|---|
作者姓名(外文) | Johnson,Henry; | 書刊名 | 民俗曲藝 |
卷期 | 144 2004.06[民93.06] |
頁次 | 頁225-262 |
專輯 | 「亞洲樂器、物質文化與意義:民族樂器學芻議」專輯 |
分類號 | 919.32 |
關鍵詞 | 區分; 群體; 認同; 日本; 箏; 意義; 演奏流派; 社會; Difference; Group; Identity; Japan; Koto; Meaning; Performance tradition; Society; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 箏 (koto) 是日本的傳統樂器。此物作為指示性符號,固定指涉一種被明確認知的傳統文化,在現代的日本具有高度意涵。這項樂器和它的組成零件在製作上通常保留著傳統的象徵,無論在樂器的設計或裝飾上皆是如此。然而,即使大體上保持著原本的結構,在由傳統設計意冒所構成的複雜語言中運作的裝飾也包括在其中,日本箏仍有一些不同的製作方式。這些差異反映出箏在日本的長久歷史中所產生的較廣樂器分群,以及賦予這項樂器美學和金錢價值的錯綜複雜的區分。同時這些區分也經常反映出箏演奏者不同的社會分群 (也就是演奏流派或群體),這些演奏者是在音樂、演奏實際和樂器之中創造出演奏認同的重要功臣。 日本箏以多種方式承載意義。在本文的討論中,焦點將放在箏作為「區分的文化」──包括物質和社會的──之部分而產生的相關意義。不論是特定的樂器樣式或特定組成部分的設計,箏擁有一些賦予這項樂器特定意義的「能指」 (signifier)。本文將專注於了解樂器設計的區分和演奏流派之中及之間的社會區分兩者的內在關聯,而存在於演奏流派中的意義使箏及其演奏者在較廣的箏樂世界中得到各自的認同。此外,在演奏的脈絡中,也就是箏的演奏群體促進了與樂器相關的社會意義的建構與競爭。為了闡明這些論點,本文分為三個互相關聯的主要部分:文化區分、物質區分和社會區分。本文的論述在於:試圖了解樂器形式之區分的一種方法,就是去了解與樂器有內在連結的社會分群的區分。 |
英文摘要 | The koto箏is a Japanese traditional musical instrument. It is highly meaningful in contemporary Japan as an object that invariably indexes a perceived traditional culture. The instrument and its component parts are usually made so that they retain emblems of tradition, whether in instrument design or decoration. However, while retaining an overall authentic structure, as well as including decoration within a complex language of meaningful traditional design motifs, the koto is made in different ways. These differences reflect not only broader instrument groupings during the koto’s long history in Japan, but also intricate differences that help give the instrument aesthetic and monetary value. Such differences often reflect different social groupings of koto players (i.e., performance traditions or groups) that are largely responsible for creating performance identity in music, performance practice and instruments The koto carries meaning in a number of ways. In this discussion focus is given to meaning that is connected with the koto as part of a culture of difference-material and social. Whether a distinct instrument type or the design of a particular component part’, the koto has a number of signifiers that give the instrument distinctive meaning. In this paper attention is given to understanding the interconnection between difference in instrument design and social difference within and between performance traditions, which are shown to be sites of meaning that give the koto and its players identity within the broader world of koto music. Furthermore, in performance contexts, it is the koto’s performance groups that help construct and contest social meaning connected with the instrument. As a way of illustrating these points, the paper divides into three main interrelated parts: cultural difference, material difference, and social difference. It is argued that one way of attempting to understand difference in instrument form is to understand difference in social groupings that are inherently connected with the instrument. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。