查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 國小聽覺障礙學生加、減法文字題閱讀理解能力之研究
- 交互教學法對增進聽覺障礙學生閱讀理解能力之研究
- 聽覺障礙學生閱讀理解能力之分析
- 電視新聞暴力內容對臺北市國小學生影響效果之探討
- 實施學校午餐指導活動對國小中年級學童飲食行為改變之研究
- 培育能提高國小學生的解決問題能力教師之研究
- 國民小學聽覺障礙學生讀話所見韻母視素研究
- 認字薄弱群體之閱讀能力及相關變項探討
- Corrdlation Between Urinary Fluoride Concentration and Dental Caries among Elementary School Students
- 國小學生電腦網路使用現況及其態度之調查研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 國小聽覺障礙學生加、減法文字題閱讀理解能力之研究=Reading Comprehension Abilities in Addition and Subtraction Word Problems of Hearing Impaired Pupils |
---|---|
作者 | 王雅蘭; 張蓓莉; Wang, Ya-lan; Chang, Beylih; |
期刊 | 特殊教育研究學刊 |
出版日期 | 20040300 |
卷期 | 26 2004.03[民93.03] |
頁次 | 頁201-219 |
分類號 | 529.67 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 聽覺障礙; 國小學生; 加/減法文字題; 閱讀理解能力; Hearning-impaired; Addition and subtraction word problems; Reading comprehension abilities; Pupils; |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在瞭解國小聽障學生加、減法文字題閱讀理解能力,蒐集閱讀理解困難部分、分析其閱讀理解錯誤表現,並比較中、高年級聽障學生能力之差異。研究利用自編工具「加、減法文字題閱讀理解測驗」(含35個句型,其中改變類11題,合併類4題,比較類14題,等化類6題)蒐集分析大臺北地區十所國小共83名中、高年級啟聰資源班學生的閱讀理解能力,結果發現:1.學生加、減法文字題閱讀理解能力及區辨不同語意結構句型的能力低落且發展緩慢。2.以70%的年級學生是否正確答題,作為句型是否困難的標準,在自編測驗的35個句型中,中年級學生有34個困難句型、高年級有29個句型。沒有困難的句型只有一句:「…和…一樣多」。3.語意關係對閱讀理解表現的影響因句型不同而有差異。4.學生顯出系統性錯誤的理解方式,且高年級學生答題出現系統性錯誤的情形明顯高於中年級學生。 |
英文摘要 | The purposes of this study were to explore reading comprehension abilities, reading difficulties, error patterns in addition and subtraction word problems of hearing impaired pupils. Performance differences between students at middle grades and upper grades were also analyzed. Reading comprehension in addition and subtraction word problems test developed by authors was used as research instrument. It included 35 sentences/phrases (11 for change, 4 for combine, 14 for compare and 6 for equalize); each one was followed by 4-6 sets of pictures. Eighty -three students only with hearing impairments were participants in this study. The main findings were: 1. the hearing-impaired students demonstrated poor and slowly developed reading comprehension abilities in addition and subtraction word problems. 2. There were 34 difficulty sentences/phrases among 35 test sentences/phrases for middle grades students, and 29 sentences/phrases for upper grades students. The only one sentence that was not challenge for all students was: the quantity is the same as A and B. 3. Students' performance varied with sentences' semantics. 4. Systematic errors were found in students' performance, and students at upper grades demonstrated more of this error pattern than that of students at middle grades. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。