查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 工作場所同性間性騷擾所引起之爭議--Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.一案判決之評析
- 美國最高法院與兩性工作平等爭議之解決
- 美國法院對工作場所性騷擾判決之發展趨勢--兼論對我國相關制度之啟示
- 美國最高法院對工作場所性騷擾爭議第一則判決之研究--Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson一案之評析
- 臺北地方法院第一則有關工作場所性騷擾判決之解析--兼論美國制度所能提供之啟示
- 美國兩性工作平等救濟制度之研究
- 事業單位應如何建構工作場所性騷擾防治措施--美國之經驗
- 我國就業歧視評議制度之現況及實施檢討評析
- 美國女性主義法學者對工作場所性騷擾爭議之批判
- 工作場所性騷擾爭議之預防及處理:臺灣之經驗
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 工作場所同性間性騷擾所引起之爭議--Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.一案判決之評析=Controversies over Same-Sex Sexual Harassment in the Workplace--A Critical Examination of the Decision of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services Inc. by the United States Supreme Court |
---|---|
作 者 | 焦興鎧; | 書刊名 | 歐美研究 |
卷 期 | 33:3 2003.09[民92.09] |
頁 次 | 頁541-598 |
專 輯 | 「美國最高法院重要判決之研究:一九九六∼一九九九」專號 |
分類號 | 556.32 |
關鍵詞 | 工作場所性騷擾; 工作場所同性間性騷擾; 就業上性別歧視; 性傾向歧視; 一九六四年民權法第七章; Sexual harassment in the workplace; Same-sex sexual harassment in the workplace; Sex discrimination in employment; Sexual orientation discrimination; Title Ⅶ of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文之目的,是要對美國最高法院一九九八年在Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.一案之判決及其實質影響,做一詳盡之檢討評析。除緒論及結語外,全文計分四個主要部分:第一部分探討同性間性騷擾在美國所引起之就業歧視爭議。第二部分說明聯邦上訴法院各巡迴法庭對此一爭議之各項歧異判決,主要以寬嚴不等之三類判決模式來加以區分。第三部分敘述最高法院在Oncale一案之判決,對整個案件之重要事實、聯邦下級法院之判決,以及最高法院之見解均加以說明。第四部分則是評析該案判決所解決之爭議、若干待決之爭點、所衍生之論爭及雇主所應採取之因應措施等。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this paper is to examine indepth the decision rendered by the U. S. Supreme Court in 1998 regarding the case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. In addition to the intro-ductory and concluding remarks, the contents of the paper are divided into four sections. Section One delves into employment discrimination disputes caused by same-sex sexual harassment in the workplace. Section Two examines three models of decisions made by federal circuit courts in accordance with different interpretations of the meaning of “sex” in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Section Three details the rulings of the Court in Oncale, including the facts, decisions of the lower courts, and the opinions of the Court itself. Finally, Section Four provides a critical discussion of the Oncale case, including the issues resolved, unresolved, derived and the responsive measures adopted by employers. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。