查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 美國女性主義法學者對工作場所性騷擾爭議之批判
- 美國法院對工作場所性騷擾判決之發展趨勢--兼論對我國相關制度之啟示
- 美國最高法院對工作場所性騷擾爭議第一則判決之研究--Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson一案之評析
- 臺北地方法院第一則有關工作場所性騷擾判決之解析--兼論美國制度所能提供之啟示
- 工作場所同性間性騷擾所引起之爭議--Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.一案判決之評析
- 美國最高法院與兩性工作平等爭議之解決
- 臺北市就業歧視評議委員會對工作場所性騷擾防制之貢獻
- 試評「民主進步黨工作場所性騷擾暨性別歧視防治辦法」--兼論幾項近期之相關發展
- 工作場所性騷擾被害人在美國尋求救濟途徑之研究
- 美國兩性工作平等救濟制度之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 美國女性主義法學者對工作場所性騷擾爭議之批判=Critique of Controversies over Sexual Harassment in the Workplace by Legal Feminists in the United States |
---|---|
作 者 | 焦興鎧; | 書刊名 | 歐美研究 |
卷 期 | 33:1 2003.03[民92.03] |
頁 次 | 頁57-123 |
分類號 | 585.4 |
關鍵詞 | 女性主義法學; 女性主義法學者; 性別歧視; 工作場所性騷擾; 一九六四年民權法第七章; Feminist jurisprudence; Feminist Legal Theory; Legal feminists; Sex discrimination; Sexual harassment in the workplace; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文之目的,是要對美國女性主義法學者對工作場所性騷擾爭議所做之相關批判及質疑,做一整體之觀察,以期瞭解她們對此一新興法域奠基之貢獻及進一步發展之期許。全文共分五大部分:第一部分說明女性主義法學之興起原因、重要流派及對性別議題之重要見解。第二部分剖析工作場所性騷擾爭議所引發之特別性別議題,並對美國最高法院所做五則相關判決做一簡要之說明。第三部分以美國聯邦最高法院在Meritor及Harris兩案之判決,說明女性主義法學者在早期所發揮之作用。第四部分則是敘述女性主義法學者在九○年代後期對此一議題之論戰,尤其是在聯邦最高法院於一九九八年庭期連續做出三項相關判決前後之質疑及批判。最後,本文將對該國女性主義法學者這些見解做一綜合評析,以為我國未來建構相同制度時奠定更堅實之法理基礎。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this paper is to observe the critique and com-ments made by legal feminists in the United States about the con-troversies over sexual harassment in the workplace. In addition, their contributions to and expectations on this issue are also examined. The contents of the paper are divided into five sections. Section One will describe three different stages of the various schools of feminist legal theory and their attitudes towards issues related to sex discrimination. Section Two will provide an analysis of controversies caused by sexual harassment in the workplace, mainly focusing on the five decisions rendered by the U.S. Supreme Court in recent years. Section Three utilizes the examples of two important cases Meritor and Harris in order to examine contributions made by legal feminists during the earlier stage, especially the efforts of Professor Catharine A. MacKinnon. Section Four emphasizes the arguments posited by a number of legal feminists concerning three related 1998 Supreme Court decisions on sexual harassment at work. Section Five comments on the opinions written by these legal feminists in order to discuss several unsolved problems concerning this issue. Finally, the discussions derived from these problems are examined to ascertain whether they can provide insights for the local legal community, and for the purpose of contributing to the further development of Taiwanese legal feminists. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。