查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Propofol-Sodium Thiopental Admixture Reduces Pain on Injection
- Can Neostigmine Reduce Propofol Injection Pain?
- 探討手術後病人對疼痛護理及疼痛控制的滿意度及其影響因素
- The Basic Unit of a Myofascial Trigger Point
- Intradermal Injection of Tramadol Has Local Anesthetic Effect: A Comparison with Lidocaine
- Repeated Lumbar Sympathetic Blockade for Complex Regional Pain Syndromes Type Ⅰ--A Case Report
- Injection Pain with Propofol: The Effectiveness of Thiopentone on Induction
- 兒童疼痛的評估與處理
- The Significance of Pain Among Chinese Patients with Cancer in Hong Kong
- 癌末病患之疼痛處置
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Can Neostigmine Reduce Propofol Injection Pain?=Neostigmine是否能減少Propofol注射痛? |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 龐維伍; 莫世湟; 汪志雄; 葉明; 張大鵬; | 書刊名 | 麻醉學雜誌 |
卷期 | 40:2 2002.06[民91.06] |
頁次 | 頁65-69 |
分類號 | 416.5 |
關鍵詞 | 靜脈麻醉劑; 疼痛; Propofol; Neostigmine; Anesthetics; Intravenous; Pain; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 背景:在文獻中Neostigmine 有週邊止痛之作用,我們把neostigmine 靜脈留置1 分鐘,用來檢驗它是否有此周邊止痛之作用以減少 propofol 注射痛。方法:利用雙盲方式 , 105 位病患隨機分為三組。 N 組 (n=35) 接受 0.5 mg neostigmine 1ml、L 組 (n=35) 接受 2% lidocaine 1 ml、C 組 (n=35) 接受 normal saline 1 ml、靜脈留置 1 分鐘,做 為 propofol 注射前之處理,以減少 propofol 注射痛。 應用小兒科的 T-connector 放置 於靜脈留罝軟針口以便藥物注射, 趕血後放上止血帶,注入要研究的藥物,靜脈留置 1 分 鐘,然後釋放止血帶,注入 propofol 引導麻醉。每一種藥物注射後都評估其注射痛及其附 作用。 結果: propofol 注射痛次數為 normal saline (85%) >neostigmine (46%)>lidocaine (6%, P<0.05), propofol 注射痛程度為 normal saline (mean rank 76.81%)>neostigmine (mean rank 50.42)>lidocaine (mean rank 34.2, P<0.05)。結論: 以靜脈留置 1 分鐘, 0.5 mg neostigmine (1 ml) 是有一些周邊止痛之作用可減少 propofol 注射痛,但比 2% lidocaine (1 ml) 的周邊止痛作用還少。 |
英文摘要 | Background:Neostigmine has been found to cause peripheral analgesia. We used venous retention technique to evaluate whether neostigmine displayed peripheral analgesic effect in reducing propofol injection pain. Methods:In a double blind fashion, 105 patients were randomly allocated to receive either 1 m 0.5 mg neostigmine (Group N, n=35), 1ml 2% lidocaine (Group L, n=35), or 1 ml normal saline (Group C, n=35) as pretreatment to reduce pain on propofol injection. A pediatric T-connector linking with the i.v. catheter port was used for injection. Venous occlusion was made possible with a tourniquet before the intravenous administration of one of the three drugs. The tested drug was allowed to retain for one minute and then the tourniquet was released for propofol injection. Pain and side effect assessments were made after propofol injection. Results:The incidence of propofol injection pain was 85% in normal saline group, 46% in neostigmine group and 6% in lidocaine group (P<0.05 among groups). The tested drugs arrayed in order of increasing magnitude of intensity of pain upon propofol injection were lidocaine (mean rank 34.20), neostigmine (mean rank 50.42) and normal saline (mean rank 76.81) in sequence (P<0.05 among groups). Conclusions:With one-minute venous retention, 0.5 mg neostigmine (1 ml) could produce peripheral analgesia to some degree in reducing propofol injection pain. However, its analgesic effect was inferior to 1 ml of 2% lidocaine. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。