查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 運動訓練與性別對學童不同感覺形式辨識能力之影響=The Effect of Sports Training and Gender to Children's Discriminative Ability by Sensory Modality |
---|---|
作 者 | 劉強; 葉志仙; 劉雅甄; 陳全壽; | 書刊名 | 大專體育學刊 |
卷期 | 2:2 2000.12[民89.12] |
頁次 | 頁37-47 |
分類號 | 528.915 |
關鍵詞 | 感覺形式; 辨識能力; 運動訓練; 陳氏手眼協調選擇反應器; Sensory modality; Discriminative ability; Sports training; Chen's hand-eye coordination recognition reaction test; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 視、聽、觸等感覺形式(sensory modalities)有不同的訊息接收能力與辨識能力,這些能力會間接或直接到個體在活動上的表現。本研究透過陳全壽博士所設計之陳氏手眼協調選擇反應器為工具,利用重覆量數(即受試者內設計)的實驗設計方式,讓六十位平均11.08±0.34歲之有無運動訓練經歷的國小五年級男、女學童,分吸以視覺、觸覺以及視覺結合觸覺等不同感覺形式,進行正方形、三角形、圓形等形態的辨識,以比較有無運動訓練經歷與不同性別之國小五年級學童不同感覺形式辨識能力的差異,以及非慣用手與慣用手間不同感覺形式辨識能力的差異;並以2x3混合設計二因子變異數分析、LSD事後比較法與相依樣本t考驗等統計方法進行分析。研究結果發現,國小五年級學童不同感覺形式辦識能力不受運動訓練與性別之影響;此外,除了雙手所進行之視覺與視覺結合觸覺辨識能力間無顯著的差異外(P>0.5),其餘在非慣用手、慣用手、雙手所進行之視覺結合觸覺辨識能力均顯著優於視覺與觸覺辦識能力,而且視覺辦識能力又顯著優於觸覺辨識能力(p<.05)。同時,慣用手的觸覺辨識能力顯著優於非慣用手(p<.05);在視覺結合觸覺以及的視覺辨識能力上,非慣用手與慣用手則無顯著的差異(p>.05)。 |
英文摘要 | Sensory modalities (e.g., vision, auditory, tactile) could have different abilities of gain information and discrimination which maybe influence on performance of physical fitness. The purpose of this study was try to compare children with and without sports training experience, between gender and between domination hand and non-domination hand on discriminative ability by different sensory modalities. The repeated measure of experimental design was used, and sixty mean age of 11.08 years old elementary school students participated in this study voluntarily. Each subject was to test Chen’s hand-eye coordination recognition reaction that designed by Dr, Chun-Show Chen to collected data including discriminative ability by visual (V), tactual (T) and combated visual and tactual (V-T). The results were analyzed by 2X3 mixed design two-way ANOVA which indicated that sports training experience and gender didn’t influence on fifth-grades students of discriminative ability by different sensory modalities (p>0.5), but advanced analysis by LSD’s method of posterior comparison which indicated that discriminative ability by V-T was the best among by V and T (p<0.20, and discriminative ability by V was better than by T on the each hand (p<.05), in addition to those finding above there was no significant difference between V-T and V on the both –hand test. The results by repeated measures t-test which indicated that domination h and superior to non-domination hand on discriminative ability by T (p<.05), there was no significant difference between domination hand and another hand (p>.05). |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。