頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從土地法第二百零八條之適用論私人興辦公共事業可否申請徵收土地=The Validity of the Application of Article 208 of the Land Law to Expropriation of Private Land for the Public Enterprises Built and Operated by Private Enterprises |
---|---|
作 者 | 劉起孝; | 書刊名 | 臺灣土地金融季刊 |
卷 期 | 35:2=136 1998.06[民87.06] |
頁 次 | 頁17-26 |
分類號 | 554.48 |
關鍵詞 | 徵收; 公共用途; 財產權; 私人參與; Expropriation; Public utility; Property; Private participation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 現階段政府部門的職能已漸由親自操槳改變為引導領航的角色,故蔚為公營事業 民營化及促進民間參與公共建設的風潮。而各項公共事業建設計畫的推動,首要的課題即是 土地的取得。然而現行實務上排除私人興辦公共事業可申請徵收土地之適用,其見解是否恰 當?本研究即從土地法第二百零八條之立法原意探討起,並進一步回溯憲法法源及立法變遷 之沿革,再佐以其他相關法律條文規定予以對照,以及察明對我國立法制度影響深遠之同屬 大陸法系國家之德國與日本立法例予以探究土地徵收之涵義,檢討得知實務上奉為圭臬的行 政院四十四年臺四四內字第八七三號令解釋之見解,實已曲解土地法第二百零八條原條文之 文義,爰作出私人興辦公共建設依法得申請徵收土地之建議。惟仍亟待進一步的研究,探討 目前我國的土地徵收制度,如何建立一套嚴謹完整的徵收審核機制(事前管制)以及規範私 人興辦公共事業的管理監督機制(事後管制),以確實達成公共利益實現的目標。 |
英文摘要 | The role of government has changed from public service offener to public service planner recently. It therefore results in the privatiziation of state enterprise and the encoruagement of private participation in public infrastructure projects. One of the most important factors affecting the success of public infrastructure projects is land acquisition. Up to now, the Executive Authority reject private applicant for expropriate private land. Is it legal or illegal? This paper is searching the original meaning of article 208 of the Land Law, and research Constitution and the changes of the Land Law, and the deal with other relative laws. Finally, it try to compare with the application of land expropria- tion of Germanic law and Japanese law. It appeals that the decree of the Executive Yuan is not satisfying to article 208 of the Land Law. So, this paper suggests that private applicant for expropriate private land is legal. In the other hand, in order to gain the public interests, it suggests to search and define an explicit rule with respect to the land expropriation about private applicant. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。