查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Some New Results on Hit Rates and Base Rates in Mental Testing
- Predictive Validity of the WISC-III (Chinese Version): A Three Year Follow-Up Study
- 加州心理成熟測驗與預官智力測驗之智力分數相關研究
- 盧-尼神經心理測驗組篩檢測驗在臺灣地區適用性之探討
- 盧一尼神經心理測驗組中文修訂版的信效度研究
- 簡易個別智力量表之編製
- 盧一尼神經心理測驗組之中文修訂與常模建立研究
- 資優生不同團體測驗篩選結果與分析
- 心理測驗與個別諮商
- 智慧拼圖之求解及其應用於智力測驗之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Some New Results on Hit Rates and Base Rates in Mental Testing=心理測驗命中率與基本率之新結果 |
---|---|
作 者 | 舒彼得; | 書刊名 | 中華心理學刊 |
卷 期 | 39:2 1997.12[民86.12] |
頁 次 | 頁173-192 |
分類號 | 179.1 |
關鍵詞 | 心理測驗; 智力測驗; 命中率偏誤; 基本率問題; 預測效度; Mental tests; IQ tests; Hit rate bias; Base rate problems; Predictive validities; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本文為最近有關命中率和基本率研究(Schonemann and Thompson,1996)之延伸 。 文中修正了先前推導基本率近似值 HR1 時的錯誤前提,另提出稍較複雜之近似值 HR2。 然而在所探討的參數範圍內, HR1 與 HR2 間僅具些微差異。 本研究推導二分效標 2 × 2 列聯表的準確命中率,並將之與 HR1,HR2, 以及從泰羅二氏( 1939 )期望表經由貝氏定 理為連續效標推導之命中率三者比較。 整體而言,較簡單之近似值 HR1 的表現優於 HR2。 最後,本研究以整體正確分類百分比為考慮條件,推導出一個測驗若要比隨機甄選有效時, 所需要的最低效度近似值。 四十多年前,Meehl 與 Rosen ( 1955 )即已提出警告:僅憑 效度係數本身並不足以評斷一個測驗在應用上的優劣,因為「當效標分類的基本率與百分之 五十偏離甚大時,使用一個具備中度或低度效度的測驗,將會導致錯誤臨床決定的增加」( 原著 215 頁)。本研究結果呼應了此點關切。 |
英文摘要 | Recent work on hit rates and base rates (Schonemann and Thompson, 1996) is extended: A flawed premise in the derivation of an earlier hit rate approximation, HR1, is corrected, leading to a slightly more complicated approximation, HR2. However, over the targeted parameter region, the differences between HR1 and HR2 are small. After deriving exact hit rates for 2 × 2 contingency tables with binary criteria, they are compared with HR1 and HR2, and also with hit rates for continuous criteria inferred, via Bayes' Theorem, from Taylor and Russell's (1939) tables. Overall, the simpler approximation HR1 outperforms HR2. Finally, a new approximation is derived for the minimum validity needed that a test improves over random admissions in terms of total percent of correct classifications. More than four decades ago, Meehl and Rosen (1955) warned that validity coefficients, in isolation, are insufficient for gauging the practical merit of a test, because, "... when the base rates of the criterion classification deviate greatly from a 50 percent split, use of a test sign having slight or moderate validity will result in an increase of erroneous clinical decisions." (p. 215. Emphasis in the original). The present results corroborate these concerns. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。