查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 盧-尼神經心理測驗組篩檢測驗在臺灣地區適用性之探討
- 「智能篩檢測驗」中文2.0版(CASI C-2.0)的一些心理計量特性及其可能存在的方言偏誤
- 記憶力衰退抱怨:失智症前兆?
- 兒童發展篩檢測驗工具之探查
- 0-3歲華語嬰幼兒溝通及語言篩檢測驗編製報告
- 失智症認知衡鑑工具在臺灣--發展、應用及限制
- 以針刺及補腎益氣活血中藥PSUNHT1對中臺灣阿茲海默氏症病人療效評估之研究
- 針刺及補腎益氣活血中藥PSUNHT1對中臺灣阿茲海默氏症病人療效評估之研究
- Assisting the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease by Medical Image Processing
- 應用中文簡短式智能評估(MMSE-C)與盧-尼神經心理測驗組篩檢測驗(LNNB-S)於腦中風患者之篩檢比較
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 盧-尼神經心理測驗組篩檢測驗在臺灣地區適用性之探討=Applicability of the Screening Test for the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 余麗樺; 郭乃文; | 書刊名 | The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences |
卷 期 | 14:12 1998.12[民87.12] |
頁 次 | 頁779-790 |
分類號 | 415.81 |
關鍵詞 | 篩檢測驗; 盧尼神經心理測驗組合; Luria-nebraska neuropsychological battery; Screening test; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究乃探討盧 -- 尼神經心理測驗組合( LNNB )之篩檢測驗的中文版在臺灣 地區的適用性。此測驗共 15 題,可用於整個神經心理功能評鑑過程的最初階段,作為初步 篩檢腦傷病患的工具。本研究收集了腦傷個案 50 名、醫院健診者 50 名、社區正常者 100 名在此篩檢測驗的反應資料,進行項目分析,建立信效度資料,進行因素分析,訂定臨界分 數,建立常模,並檢查年齡和教育程度的影響。研究結果發現,本篩檢測驗的信度和效度均 佳,年齡和教育程度對測驗表現有影響,除了根據全體正常控制組所建立的暫時性地區常模 之外,尚有次團體常模的建立。根據全體樣本進行因素分析的結果,共抽取三個因素:因素 一是數字概念與簡單計算、因素二是高等認知功能、因素三是動作控制與節奏,其共可解釋 測驗分數的總變異量的 60%。此外也對高低教育組各建議不同之臨界分數。 |
英文摘要 | The study was to examine the applicability of the screening test for the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery in Taiwan. This screening test contains 15 items. It could be used at the first stage of neuropsychological assessment process and served as a screening tool for brain-damaged patients. In this study, 50 brain-damaged patients, 50 normal controls receiving physical examination, and 100 normal controls from local communities were sampled and administered with the screening test. Based on test results, item analysis and factor analysis were performed, reliability and validty data were established, and temporary local norm and subgroup norm were also developed. It also investigated the effects of age and educational level on test performance. Further factor analysis with total subjects showed that three factors were extracted. Factor 1 was number concept and simple calculation. Factor 2 was higher cortical function. Factor 3 was motor control and rhythm. These three factors accounted for sixty percent of total variance. In addition, cut-off scores were set for low and high education groups. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。