查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Isolated from Blood in Two Different Time Periods
- 比較新舊Beta-Lactam 類抗生素與氨基苷醣類抗生素對常見臨床分離菌之抗菌力 (第2 報):綠膿桿菌
- Antibacterial Activity of Cephem Antibiotics Against Common Clinical Isolates (3):Pseudomonas aeruginosa
- Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Klebsiella Pneumoniae Isolates Resistant to Extended-Spectrum β-Lactam Antibiotics
- 氣渦輪機使用液態空氣之進口空氣冷卻系統
- 以聚苯乙烯和含羥基之苯乙烯共聚物為共膜材料製備乙基纖維素微膠囊及其制放行為研究
- Cycle Time Reduction of a Color Monitor Tube Fluorescent Coating Ling
- 利用雙軸擠壓技術製造素肉之研究(2)--原料配方與添加物對素肉品質之影響
- 淘汰雞肉與機械去骨雞肉漿之抽取與分離蛋白質品質評估
- 反轉電滲流毛細管電泳與高效率液相層析分離四種Cinnamic Acid衍生物之比較
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Isolated from Blood in Two Different Time Periods=兩個不同時段從血液培養分離的綠膿桿菌菌株對抗菌藥物感受性之比較 |
---|---|
作 者 | 張上淳; 陳宜君; 盧進德; 謝維銓; | 書刊名 | 中華民國感染症醫學會雜誌 |
卷 期 | 8:1 1997.06[民86.06] |
頁 次 | 頁21-27 |
分類號 | 414.83 |
關鍵詞 | 血液培養; 分離; 綠膿桿菌; 抗菌藥物; In vitro activity; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 綠膿桿菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa)近年來一直是各種院內感染重要的致病菌,即使是菌血症亦不例外。為了瞭解近年來造成菌血症之綠膿桿菌菌株對各種抗菌藥物的感受性是否有所變化,我們收集了1991年1月至1992年6月以及1995年1月至12月兩個時段在臺大醫院住院病人血液培養所分離的綠膿桿菌菌株(分別有59株和55株),並以微量肉汁稀釋法(broth microdilution method)測試它們對piperacillin, ceftazidime, cefepime, cefpirome, amikacin, aztreonam, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, lomefloxacin, sparfloxacin和levofloxacin等抗菌藥物的感受性。結果發現amikacin, cefepime, ciprofloxacin和piperacillin是最有效的藥物,對1995年菌株的有效率分別為98.2﹪,94.5﹪,92.7﹪,和90.9﹪。其次較有效的藥物為imipenem(87.3﹪的菌株具感受性),ceftazidime, aztreonam,和lomefloxacin(均為76.4﹪的菌株具感受性)。除了 amikacin 以外,各種藥物對前後兩個時段菌株的MIC�t,MIC均沒有兩倍以上的差異,而 amikacin對1995年菌株的MIC�t,MIC比1991至1992年菌株的MIC�t,MIC有4 倍的下降。 雖然兩個時段之菌株對各種藥物具感受性的比例,均未有統計上有意義的變化,然而1995年菌株對piperacillin, ceftazidime, aztreonam, imipenem以及cefpirome具感受性的比例,仍然是比1991至1992年的菌株來得較低。綜合而言,持續的監測綠膿桿菌對各種藥物的感受性仍然有其必要性,對臨床醫師在選擇治療藥物時有其參考價值。 |
英文摘要 | In this study, the in vitro activities of piperacillin, ceftazidime, cefepime, cefpirome, amikacin, aztreonam, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, lomefloxacin, sparfloxacin and levofloxacin against blood culture isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from National Taiwan University Hospital were studied and compared in two different time periods. The first time period included 59 isolates from January 1991 through June 1992, and the second time period included 55 isolates from January 1995 through December 1995. Amikacin, cefepime, ciprofloxacin and piperacillin were found to be the most effective agents with susceptibility rates of 98.2﹪, 94.5﹪, 92.7﹪ and 90.9﹪, respectively, for strains of the second time period. These were followed by imipenem, with a susceptible rate of 87.3 ﹪, then ceftazidime, aztreonam and lomefloxacin, with a susceptible rate of 76.4 ﹪. Except for amikacin, none of the antibiotics showed more than a two-fold change in MIC�t or MIC during this five-year period, whereas amikacin showed a four-fold decrease in strains of the second time period. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the susceptible percentage between strains of the two different time periods for any of the antibiotics, the strains of the second time period appeared to have lower susceptible rates to piperacillin, ceftazidime, aztreonam, imipenem and cefpirome. Totally, amikacin and cefepime were found to be the most active and stable agents for strains from both periods. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。