查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 左傳與國語=Tso-Chuan(左傳) and Kuo-Yu(國語) |
---|---|
作者 | 鍾永發; | 書刊名 | 美和專校學報 |
卷期 | 15 1997.06[民86.06] |
頁次 | 頁1-33 |
分類號 | 621.77、621.77 |
關鍵詞 | 左傳; 國語; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文係筆者計畫寫作的《左傳的研究•源流篇》的第四章。有清一代,考據盛行 ,疑古風熾。或謂《左氏》乃劉歆附益改竄,或謂《左氏》由《國語》割裂而成。本文試圖 由《國語》之概述,說明從來對《國語》之名稱、作者與本質認知上之歧見,進而分析《左 》、《國》二書是否同一作者,二書是否由一書化分,以及二書成書先後的問題。最後則以 史學家取材之限制與標準,認為左丘明傳《春秋》,必受許多限制,為補苴罅漏,左氏將其 所搜集之資料,輯為《國語》,乃極為合理之事。 |
英文摘要 | This paper is one of my series studies on the origin of Tso-Chuan. Three of my series studies have been published before. During the Manchu Dynasty (清朝 ), a lot of history scholars question the contents and origins of some old books. Some scholars argue that Tso-Chuan is made up by Liu, Shin (劉歆 ) at Han Dynasty (漢朝 ), Other suppose that Tso-Chuan is extracted from Kuo-Yu. This paper tries to analyze whether Tso-Chuan and Kuo-Yu are written by the same author, wether Tso-Chuan is extracted from Kuo-Yu, and whether Tso-Chuan is written after Kuo-Yu. I conclude that it should be a reasonable speculation that Kuo-Yu is written by Tso, Chiu-Ming (左丘明 ) for the purpose to compensate the deficit of Tso-Chuan. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。