查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 獨特性癖與社會建構:邁向一個性解放的新理論
- 空間、記憶與屬性認同:論《偶然生為亞裔人》
- A Study of Some COLOR Compound Words in English (Part 1)
- 隱喻的意義及其在學校行政問題解決的應用
- Creative Metaphors in Chinese Magazine Advertisements for Watches
- 儒家哲學在心理學上的意涵
- 龍脈:中國傳統之山脈的地景隱喻
- 重新上路:文化批評中的旅行隱喻
- 女兒的凝視:電影中的父女情結
- Dis-Cursivity of Psychoanalysis: The Lost Origin vs an Imaginary Return
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 獨特性癖與社會建構:邁向一個性解放的新理論=Idiosyncratic Sexuality and the Social Construction of Sexuality: Towards a Theory of Sexual Emancipation |
---|---|
作 者 | 甯應斌; | 書刊名 | 臺灣社會研究季刊 |
卷 期 | 26 1997.06[民86.06] |
頁 次 | 頁67-127 |
分類號 | 544.528 |
關鍵詞 | 心理分析; 性的社會建構; 性的唯意志論; 獨特性癖; 性差異; 性慾望/無意識; 性認同; 性多元; 性心情; 隱喻; 偶然; 性解放; 情慾政治; 何春蕤; 羅逖; Psychoanalysis; Social construction of sexuality; Sexual voluntarism; Idiosyncratic sexuality; Sexual diversities; Desire/unconscious; Sexual identity; Polysexuals or sexual variants; Sexual moods; Metaphor; Contingency; Emancipation of sexualities; The politics of sexuality or erotic politics; Chuen-juei Ho; Richard Rorty; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 社會中的性壓迫表現為各種情慾模式的階層化(stratification),下階層的情慾 模式有分配的公平 (distributive justice) 問題。性解放運動就是情慾下層爭取平等、反 對「性」作為階層化之因素的運動。本文所提出的性解放新理論,不但反駁了各種對性解放 運動目標的可能質疑,並且指出傳統的女性主義、馬克思主義、某些後現代論述無法完善的 處理性壓迫問題,同時本文也系統地陳述了性解放理論的關鍵論旨。此一論旨可以表達如下 :為什麼人的性慾望會有偏好同性或異性、偏好變態或常態、偏好常軌或偏差... 等等差異 ? 這些差異完全是權力的塑造或社會建構的結果嗎? 本文將說明,性慾望差異不能被既有的 階級、性別... 權力關係所解釋。本文接著說明:面對各種不論是否「有害」的慾望或慾望 差異,一個進步的性政治都不應禁止或壓抑這些慾望模式,而應呵護與流通它們,以便發展 出更多性差異來改變原有 (「有害的」 ) 意義。 |
英文摘要 | The present essay suggests a way to resolve the seemingly inherent contradiction between the conception of "socially constructed sexuality" and that of "erotic diversity," through an investigation of the nature of erotic idiosyncrasy and various conceptions of socially constructed sexuality. By distinguishing sexual identity from sexual desire, this esssay argues that while our sexual identity is socially constructed, erotic diversity in terms of sexual desires cannot be explained by our present culture or social relations. Although my sexual desire/sexual identity distinction comes out of a Freudian tradition, it has now taken a linguistic turn. With the theoretical vehicle provided by Richard Rorty, I argue that, unlike the Freudian opposition between the impulsive power of sexual instinct and the repressive force of civilization, the relation between sexual desire and sexual identity is better understood in the trajectory of the "metaphor." This then leads to the conclusion that a progressive and liberating sexual politics should not aim at the curbing or repression of sexual desires or erotic diversity. Instead, it should work to promote sexual equality by further cultivating and developing erotic diversity and thereby transoforming the power context of sexual desires as well as the meaning of sexual identities. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。