查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 學校教育是偉大的平衡器或不公平的再製者=Are Schools the Great Equalizer or Reproducter of Inequality |
---|---|
作者 | 鄭淵全; | 書刊名 | 初等教育學報 |
卷期 | 4 1996.06[民85.06] |
頁次 | 頁127-167 |
分類號 | 520 |
關鍵詞 | 學校教育; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 功能典範學者主張教育是偉大的平衡器。學校教育創造一個真正開放給有才能者的社會。在功績主義的社會中,真正的教育機會均等正:決定個人成就或地位的是才能和努力。但新馬克思主義學者主張學校正增加階級的不公平。本文從理論的探討,學校教育擴張與機會均等,學校教育與機會均等,學校教育與不公平等觀點來論證二典範的主張。在現代的社會中,學校教育確實在職業地位、社會流動、意識型態等扮演重要功能。社會階級對個人學業成就確實深遠的影響。學校教育並非社會不公平的偉大平衡器;但也沒有證據顯示學校在再製社會公平。 |
英文摘要 | The functional paradigm claims that education is the great equalizer. Schools help to create a society truly open to talent. In meritocratic society true equality of opportunity: a society where ability and effort rather than class or social origins determine success and status. The Neo-Marxist theries argument, therefore, is that the educational system reinforces class inequalities in contemporary society. The article discuss four kinds of issues that should be kept distinct: theories of functional and radical paradigms, the expansion of schooling and equality of opportu-nity, schooling and equality of opportunity, inequality in school performance. Conclusion, first, Schools are essential institutions in modern society because they perform in important function in status position, social fluidity and ideology. second, the social class effects students’ academic achievement. third, schools are neither a great equalizer nor reproductor of class inequalities. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。