查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 魏氏幼兒智力量表(WPPSI-R)因素架構研究
- 門診病患對醫院滿意度與重視度之調查以臺灣地區區域醫院為例
- 從海難事件的發生論船員與船舶間互動效能的提昇
- WWW的使用瓶頸因素及使用者區隔探討--以北區大學傳播相關學系學生為例
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Factor Analysis Using the ECME Algorithm with Complete and Incomplete Data
- 中醫醫院門診病人選擇醫院之考慮因素及就醫滿意度研究--以臺中市七家中醫醫院為例
- 臺灣地區花卉批發市場服務品質構成因素及其衡量之研究: 從承銷人的觀點
- 多變量分析應用在乾燥中心燃油效率分析
- 臺灣木構造房屋建築市場現況調查分析
- 工作限制對國小學童投擲動作型式的影響
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 魏氏幼兒智力量表(WPPSI-R)因素架構研究=Factor Structure and Variance Partitionment on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-revised (WPPSI-R) in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳心怡; 陳榮華; 朱建軍; | 書刊名 | 測驗年刊 |
卷 期 | 47:2 2000.07[民89.07] |
頁 次 | 頁17-33 |
分類號 | 179.2 |
關鍵詞 | 魏氏幼兒智力量表; 因素分析; 共同變異量; 特殊變異量; 臺灣常模; WPPSI-R; Factor analysis; Common variance; Specific variance; Taiwan norm; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 魏氏幼兒智力量表修訂版(Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Revised Edition; WPPSI-R)是國內新近標準化完成,適用於3至7歲半兒幼兒的個別化智力測量工具。本研究根據WPPSI-R臺灣標準化樣本900位幼兒資料,進行探索與體證性因素分析,討論WPPSI-R之潛在因素架構,同時為了瞭解共同因素架構在不同年齡層間是否具有一定之穩定度,也將常模樣本分為三個年齡層,每組300人,分別進行因素分析。此外,研究者並探討每一個分測驗之g因素負荷量,以及不同變異來源,以便對WPPSI-R整體測驗架構與個別分測驗之角色有更深入認識。研究主要發現如下:(1)臺灣常模在WPPSI-R上呈現明顯之語文與作業「二因素架構」;(2)此「二因素架構」在不同年齡層間具有相當之穩定性;(3)語文分測驗普遍比作業分測驗有較高之g因素負荷量;(4)「矩陣推理」與「動物樁」分測驗之表現與傳統研究結果不同,值得深入探討。文中並討論研究限制並對未來研究提出建議。 |
英文摘要 | The Wechsler Primary and Preschool Scale of Intelligence-Revised (WPPSI-R) is the most recent standardized intelligence test for young children age from 3 to 7 1/2 years old in Taiwan. The main purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure of WPPSI-R in Taiwan. Data based on the Taiwan WPPSI-R norm sample of 900 young children was analyzed, and both the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. Furthermore, the g loading, and both common and specific variance for each individual subtest were also examined for a better understanding of the role each subtest play in this battery. Four major findings were as the following: (1) Two common factors, Verbal vs. Performance, were identified in this sample; (2)This Two-factor solution is consistent across various age levels; (3)Verbal subtests generally have higher g loadings while compared to performance subtests; and (4)Matrix Reasoning, Animal Pegs, and Object Assembly were subtest which deserve more studies. Research limitations and suggestions for future researches were also discussed. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。