頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論「管子」四篇的學派歸屬問題--一個孟子學的觀點= |
---|---|
作者 | 楊儒賓; |
期刊 | 鵝湖學誌 |
出版日期 | 19941200 |
卷期 | 13 1994.12[民83.12] |
頁次 | 頁63-105 |
分類號 | 121.61 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 管子四篇; 精氣; 身體; 孟子學; Kuan tzu four chapters; Zing-qi; Body; Mencius study; |
中文摘要 | 本文檢討《管子》四篇的學派歸屬問題,本文的結論是:沒有統一的《管子》四篇,只有兩組《管子》兩篇。《白心》與《心術上》當屬於早期的黃老學派作品,《內業》及《心術下》則為孟子後學所著。以往幾種較流行的假說:如「宋鈃、尹文說」、「慎到、田駢說」、「黃老道家說」都不可靠。 |
英文摘要 | This paper aims at discussing the problem of authorship of thefour essays in Kuan-Tzu. The conclusion we have is: four essays inKuan-Tzu are not produced by an unified school; they should bedivided into two sets of different schools. "Pai-Hsin" and "Hsin-Shu(I)" are works of the school of early Huang-Lao Taoism. "Nei-Yeh" and "Hsin-Shu (II)" are written by the Mencian scholars.Several accepted hypotheses in the past, such as "the theory ofSung Hsing-Yin Wan" and "the theory of Taoism" etc. are notreliable. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。