頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 陳子龍《詩問略》研探=A Study of Ch'en Tzu-lung's Shih wen lueh |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔣秋華; 蔣秋華; | 書刊名 | 中國文哲研究集刊 |
卷 期 | 5 民83.09 |
頁 次 | 頁97-127 |
分類號 | 093 |
關鍵詞 | 陳子龍; 詩問略; 詩經; 朱熹; 詩集傳; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 科舉制度下的元、明兩代《詩經》學,大部分的注解,均以朱熹的《詩集傳》為法式,依循莫違。然自明中葉以後,由於學術風尚的轉變,學者重新檢討宋學的價值,對於成為科考教本的宋儒經注,已有學者提出批判性的論述,《詩經》方面,即有不少的著作,其撰述是以反朱注為目的的。然因利祿的誘惑,學子大都無法完全擺脫科舉的桎梏,仍舊受制於傳統的經說,使得那些反駁的見解,沒有受到較多的重視,以致其中究竟表達了什麼意見?其見解如何?世人均不甚了然。本文選取陳子龍的《詩問略》,作為研究的對象,希望經由仔細的探析,得以明瞭他的《詩經》學說及其反駁朱子的意見,進而獲悉這一時期學者所撰《詩》注在經學史上的意義與價值。 |
英文摘要 | During the Yuan-Ming period,along with the institutionalization of the civil service examination system, most of the notations to Shih ching took after Chu Hsi's Shih chi chuan. It was not until mid-Ming that, due to changes in the intellectual arena, Confucian scholars began to re-evaluate the Sung Learning and offered critical commentaries on the Sung writings which had been regarded as textbooks for the examinations. So far as Shih ching is concerned, a number of thesecritics in particular aimed at challenging Chu Hsi's viewpoints. Attracted by profits and offices,however,most of the examinees could hardly relieve themselves from the bounds of traditional interpretations. The dissenting ideas, therefore, have received little attention. What message do they carry? Are they valuable? Very few people could answer these questions. In view of such a situation, this essay studies Ch'en Tzulung's Shih wen lueh in the hope that a careful examination would explicate Ch'en's interpretation of Shih ching, including his refutation of Chu Hsi's ideas, and would, furthermore, illuminate the historical implications of these dissenting works in the study of the Chinese Classics. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。