查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 多元價值和「對」的優先性
- 羅爾斯論「對錯的優先性」
- 桑德爾對羅爾斯「正義論」的批評
- 當代哲學祭酒羅爾斯[John Rawls]--要了解當代政治哲學自「正義論」始
- 羅爾斯與政治哲學的實際任務
- 社會正義的理想與實現--評介[李少軍等譯]《正義論》
- 電子相對濕度計應用於穀物含水率之測定技術
- Laminar Mixed Convection in a Horizontal Tube with a Longitudinal Squar e Core
- Effect of initial Condition on Unsteady Thermosolutal Cavity Convection with Opposed Buoyancy Forces
- High-Resolution Navier-Stokes Computations of The Axisymmetric Shell wi th Turbulence Models
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 多元價值和「對」的優先性=Pluralism and the Priority of Right |
---|---|
作者 | 林火旺; | 書刊名 | 國立臺灣大學哲學論評 |
卷期 | 15 1992.01[民81.01] |
頁次 | 頁35-52 |
專輯 | 存在與價值研討會專號 |
分類號 | 199.7 |
關鍵詞 | 多元價值; 對; 優先性; 善的最大化; 正義即公平; 羅爾斯; 正義論; John Rawls; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
英文摘要 | John Rawls argues, in his renowned book A Theory of Justice, that the concept of right is prior to the concept of the good. It seems the underlying idea is that he takes the diversity of comprehensive philosophical or moral doctrines as an enduring fact of the public culture of the contemporary constitutional democracy. Therefore, he attempts to construct his conception of juctice without presupposing any particular comprehensive ideal of the good. This article tries to show that Rawls does assume a controversial conception of the good, namely, the individualistic ideal of the person, as one of premises in developing his theory of justice. In other words, Rawls cannot consistently holds the priority of right over the good. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。