查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 人工智慧在教育評量中的角色、影響與教師職責之探討
- AI會搶走人類的飯碗嗎?AI與人類是相互競爭還是相輔相成?
- 當人工智慧進入政府:公共行政理論對AI運用的反思
- 數位時代的造浪者:生成式人工智慧如何重塑圖書出版的內容行銷策略
- 人力資源管理的新挑戰--人機協作
- AI在教育研究領域的應用系列(9):AI應用與質化研究:AILYZE軟體在質性訪談分析應用案例
- 教師在知識翻新環境之跨領域教學設計對GAI的提問與感知研究
- AI在教育研究領域的應用系列(13):AI輔助系統性文獻回顧與Rayyan應用
- 從國際案例來看人工智慧在教育評量的應用議題與挑戰
- 生成式人工智慧下程式設計學習的新需求與新方法:以案例式推理為例
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 人工智慧在教育評量中的角色、影響與教師職責之探討=The Role, Influences, and Responsibilities of Teachers in Artificial Intelligence for Educational Assessment |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 陳琨義; 洪福源; | 書刊名 | 台灣教育研究期刊 |
| 卷 期 | 6:5 2025.09[民114.09] |
| 頁 次 | 頁313-327 |
| 分類號 | 312.83 |
| 關鍵詞 | 人工智慧; 人機協作; 多元評量模式; 形成性評量; 教育評量; Artificial intelligence; AI; Educational assessment; Formative assessment; Human-AI collaboration; Multiple assessment models; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文探討人工智慧(AI)與生成式人工智慧(GAI)在教育評量中的應用現況、影響與教師職責轉變。AI擅長即時分析大規模學習數據,GAI則能快速生成試題與個別化回饋,兩者整合形成「生成與評改一體化」的新型評量模式,有效提升形成性評量的即時性與靈活性。然而,AI系統在透明性、數據偏誤、隱私保護與質性能力評估方面仍存限制,對教育公平與信任機制帶來影響。在此背景下,教師角色正從評分者轉型為AI監督者與學習設計者,需具備資料素養、評量設計素養與AI監督素養,並可參照TPACK與DigCompEdu框架實施三階段監督評量流程。本文建議未來研究應強化跨域整合、提升演算法可解釋性、完善隱私與倫理治理機制,並透過教師專業培訓與人機協作,建構具備效率、公平與人文關懷的智慧教育評量體系,實現永續教育的發展目標。 |
| 英文摘要 | This study explores the current applications, influences, and evolving teacher responsibilities related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in educational assessment. While AI excels in real-time analysis of large-scale learning data, GAI enables rapid generation of test items and personalized feedback. The integration of both technologies has given rise to a new assessment model that combines generation and evaluation, enhancing the immediacy and flexibility of formative assessment. However, issues such as algorithmic opacity, data bias, privacy concerns, and limitations in assessing qualitative competencies present significant influences to fairness and trust in education. Against this backdrop, the teacher's role is shifting from that of a grader to an AI supervisor and learning designer, requiring competencies in data literacy, assessment design, and AI supervision. The study suggests leveraging the TPACK and DigCompEdu frameworks to implement a three-stage supervised assessment process. It further recommends that future research strengthen interdisciplinary integration, improve algorithm explainability, establish robust privacy and ethical governance mechanisms, and enhance teacher training and human-AI collaboration. Ultimately, the goal is to build an intelligent assessment ecosystem that is efficient, fair, and human-centered, aligned with the vision of sustainable education. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。