查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- The Syntax of Cantonese Ho2 Revisited: Sentence-final Particle and Pro-sentence
- 粵語句末助詞的不對稱分布
- Segmentless Sentence-Final Particles in Cantonese: An Experimental Study
- A Complex ForceP for Speaker- and Addressee-oriented Discourse Particles in Cantonese
- 粵語句末助詞“添”虛實相交的行、知、言三域
- Cantonese as Learned by Missionaries in the 19th Century: Language Variation in Easy Lessons in Chinese
- Derivation of the Apparent Narrow Scope of Sentence-final Particles in Chinese: A Reply to Erlewine (2017)
- The Interaction between Modals and SFPs in Mandarin Chinese: A Cartographic Approach
- Revisiting the Taxonomy of Interrogatives in Cantonese
- The Syntax of the Sentence-final Particle Gaa3 in Cantonese
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | The Syntax of Cantonese Ho2 Revisited: Sentence-final Particle and Pro-sentence=重探粵語句末疑問“嗬”的句法:句末助詞和代句詞 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 吳家軒; | 書刊名 | 中國語文研究 |
| 卷 期 | 45:1 2024.06[民113.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-19 |
| 分類號 | 802.5233 |
| 關鍵詞 | 粵語; 句末助詞; 代句詞; 確認助詞; 左緣結構; Cantonese; Sentence-final particle; Pro-sentence; Confirmationals; Left-periphery; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| DOI | 10.2478/scl-2024-0001 |
| 中文摘要 | 本文重新探討句尾成分“嗬”的句法特性,並主張粵語存在兩類“嗬”。儘管已有 大量研究,包括 Lam(2014)、Tang(2020)和 Law et al.(2024),但針對如“咩 嗬”等組合的語言直覺仍然莫衷一是。此外,Law et al.(2024)引入的涉及聽話人 轉換的“嗬”尚未得到充分研究。為了解決這些問題,本文觀察“嗬”是否能與程 度句尾助詞共現。結果顯示,不涉及聽話人轉換的“嗬”(“嗬 1”)和涉及聽話 人轉換的“嗬”(“嗬 2”)有兩套不同的句法行為。本文主張“嗬 1”是佔據 F3P 中心語的句末助詞,“嗬 2”是一個通過空連詞與前述句子合併形成廣義聯合結構 的代句詞。基於這個分析,本文重新審視以往的文獻。本文的分析比起以往文獻能 夠更全面地覆蓋有關“嗬”的語言事實,從而提升對自然語言左緣結構的理解。 |
| 英文摘要 | This paper re-examines the syntactic properties of the sentence-final particle (henceforth, SFP) ho2 in Hong Kong Cantonese (henceforth, Cantonese). Despite studies such as Lam 2014, Tang 2020, and Law et al. 2024, variation persists among native speakers in their judgments regarding the acceptability of SFP clusters such as me1-ho2. Additionally, Law et al.’s (2024) preliminary observation that ho2 involves an addressee shift remains underexplored. To address these issues, this paper investigates whether ho2 can co-occur with the class of Degree SFPs (Tang 2015a). The results reveal that there are two distinct ho2s: one operating at the propositional level and the other at the speech act level. To capture this contrast, I propose that ho2[A] is an SFP occupying the head of F3P, which is one of the layers of the split-FP under the cartographic approach (Tang 2015b). On the other hand, ho2[B] is a pro-sentence merged with the antecedent sentence by an empty conjunction, forming a general conjunctive structure. The proposed account provides better empirical coverage compared to previous literature (Lam 2014; Law et al. 2024) and enhances our understanding of the nature of the left periphery in natural languages. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。