頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 林安梧對於「黃漢忠、許明珠、吳美瑤、李瑞全」四位教授評議之回覆=A Response to the Reviews by Professors Hon-Chung Wong, Ming-Chu Hsu, Mei-Yao Wu, and Shui-Chuen Lee by An-Wu Lin |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 林安梧; | 書刊名 | 本土諮商心理學學刊 |
| 卷 期 | 15:3 2024.09[民113.09] |
| 頁 次 | 頁204-234 |
| 專 輯 | 從新儒學到後新儒學 |
| 分類號 | 128 |
| 關鍵詞 | 當代新儒家; 實踐; 良知自我坎陷; 方法論; 約定主義; 本質主義; 學習次序; 現代化; Contemporary Neo-Confucianism; Practice; Self-entrapment of conscience; Methodology; Conventionalism; Essentialism; Learning order; Modernization; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese);英文(English) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文針對黃漢忠、許明珠、吳美瑤、李瑞全四位教授的評議進行了回應,主要討論 了當代新儒家的實踐哲學、道德與政治的關係、中西文化的差異以及政權的合法性等問 題。值得注意的是,關於牟宗三的「良知自我坎陷」說,由於其過於理想化,且重視的 是詮釋上的理論次序,而忽略了社會實踐的真實歷程。作者主張應該從外王學習過程中 調節內聖,並提出「方法論上的約定主義」以替代「方法論上的本質主義」。再者,他強 調中國文化傳統並非本質上妨礙現代化,而是可以在適應現代社會需求的同時發揮其獨 特價值。作者還討論了政權的合法性與民主制度的建立,認為道德與政治應該相輔相成, 共同構建和諧社會。他最後提到,應該明確區分歷史的發生次序、實踐的學習秩序以及 理論的邏輯次序,以促進現代化的有效發展。 |
| 英文摘要 | This article responds to the reviews by Professors Hon-Chung Wong, Ming-Chu Hsu, MeiYao Wu, and Shui-Chuen Lee, focusing on issues such as the practical philosophy of Contemporary Neo-Confucianism, the relationship between morality and politics, the differences between Chinese and Western cultures, and the legitimacy of political power. Notably, regarding Mou Zongsan’s theory of "Self-Entrapment of Conscience," it is critiqued for being overly idealistic and for emphasizing interpretative theoretical order while neglecting the true process of social practice. The author advocates for adjusting the inner sagehood through the learning process of the outer kingliness and proposes "methodological conventionalism" as a replacement for "methodological essentialism." Furthermore, he emphasizes that the traditional Chinese culture does not inherently hinder modernization but can exert its unique value while adapting to the needs of modern society. The author also discusses the establishment of political legitimacy and democratic systems, arguing that morality and politics should complement each other in building a harmonious society. He concludes by stating that it is essential to clearly distinguish the historical order of occurrence, the learning order of practice, and the logical order of theory to promote the effective development of modernization. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。