頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 違法性認識的定位:“釋法中心論”之故意說=The System Positioning of Illegality Cognition: Theory of Intentional through the Interpretation Centered Theory |
---|---|
作 者 | 趙天琦; | 書刊名 | 澳門法學 |
卷 期 | 2024:1=55 2024.03[民113.03] |
頁 次 | 頁106-121 |
分類號 | 580.1 |
關鍵詞 | 違法性認識; 體系定位; 釋法中心論; 故意說; 類型化方案; Illegality cognition; System positioning; Interpretation centered theory; Theory of intentional; Typed; Scheme; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 違法性認識定位理論中,故意說和責任說在規範依據上分別以“釋法中心論”和“立法修正論” 為路徑。然而,責任說與我國刑法中的實質故意概念不能自洽,缺乏刑法上的規範根據,具有淪為危險控制 工具的風險。故意說與我國《刑法》第14條實質故意的概念相契合,通過對刑法分則中“明知”的解釋、對社 會危害性認識與違法性認識關係的厘清,既能在我國刑法體系中確立具有緩和規制效果的違法性認識的恰當定 位,也能有效避免處罰的漏洞。應破除線型邏輯,重視社會危害性認識與違法性認識之“交叉關係”。在類型 化思維指導下,根據不同的認知狀況,可推導出假性的違法性認識錯誤、未必的違法性認識與真正的違法性認 識錯誤,對每種情形進行分類處理是實現違法性認識司法接納的有效路徑。 |
英文摘要 | In the system positioning of illegality cognition, Theory of Intentional and Theory of culpability take the “interpretation centered theory” and the “legislative amendment theory” as the paths respectively.However,Theory of culpability is not consistent with the concept of substantial intent in our criminal law, and lacks the normative basis in criminal law, which risks becoming a tool of risk control tool.The theory of Intentional is consistent with the concept of substantial intention in Article 14 of the criminal law of China. Through the interpretation of “knowing” in the special provisions of the criminal law and the clarification of the relationship between social harmfulness cognition and illegality cognition, it can not only establish an appropriate positioning of illegality cognition with mitigating regulation effect in the criminal law system of China, but also effectively avoid the loophole of punishment.We should break the linear logic and pay attention to the “cross relationship” between social harmfulness cognition and illegality cognition. Under the guidance of typological thinking, according to different cognitive conditions, it is possible to deduce the false illegality error, cognition of non-necessarily illegality, and the true illegality error. Classifying each situation is an effective way to realize judicial acceptance of illegality cognition. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。