頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 為歐洲人權法院辯護=Plaidoyer for the European Court of Human Rights |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 保羅.本托.德.阿爾布克基; 尹燕紅; | 書刊名 | 澳門法學 |
| 卷 期 | 2024:1=55 2024.03[民113.03] |
| 頁 次 | 頁24-39 |
| 分類號 | 579.27 |
| 關鍵詞 | 歐洲人權法院; 權力和問責; 司法獨立; 法院判例; 法律解釋; 透明度; European Court of Human Rights; Powers and duties; Judicial independence; Jurisprudence; Statutory interpretation; Transparency; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 在本篇文章中,作者探討了歐洲人權法院和其締約國之間存在緊張關係的原因。作者認為,針對 歐洲人權法院的眾多批評最終都指向了構建歐洲人權保護體系的基本原則,比如演化解釋方法和歐洲共識,也 指向了歐洲人權法院的軟法和法院對社會權利的友好立場。同時作者簡要分析了歐洲人權法院對這些批評的回 應,指出人權法院的回應是相互矛盾的。在此背景下,作者認為,英國公然違背歐洲人權法院對Hirst案的判 決以及人權法院在一些重要案件中改變它自身確立的解釋原則,對《歐洲人權公约》的締約國產生了滾雪球般 的負面影響,俄羅斯立法者對歐洲人權法院的對抗態度即是證明。在文章最後,作者對歐洲人權法院的傳統推 理模式進行了辯護,並強調要通過三步,即“更加獨立,更加透明,更多問責”,對法院進行改革。 |
| 英文摘要 | In this article, the author debates the reasons for the current strained relationship between some Con- tracting Parties and the European Court of Human Rights. The author argues that much of the criticism addressed to the Court is ultimately aimed at the founding principles of the European human rights protection system, like the principles of evolutive interpretation and European consensus, as well as at the Court’s soft law and social rights friendly stance. He briefly analyses the contradictory reaction of the Court to this criticism. In this context, he considers that both the UK rebellion against Hirst and the Court’s backtracking from its own principles of interpretation in some major cases have had a negative “snow ball” effect on other Contracting Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights, as the re- cent confrontational attitude of the Russian legislator towards the Court has shown. The article concludes with a defence of the Court’s traditional mode of reasoning and a pledge for reform of some practices of the Court based on three steps: more independence, more transparency and more accountability. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。