查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 《中華人民共和國公司法》修改背景下公司歸入權制度的立法論=The Legislative Revision of the Right to Disgorgement in the Company Law of the People's Republic of China |
---|---|
作 者 | 李飛; 龐茜月; | 書刊名 | 一國兩制研究 |
卷 期 | 50 2023.10[民112.10] |
頁 次 | 頁35-49 |
分類號 | 587.92 |
關鍵詞 | 歸入權; 忠實義務; 信義義務; 信託關係; Right of disgorgement; Duty of loyalty; Duty of trust; Fiduciary relationship; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 公司歸入權來源於英美法系的“推定信託”理論,是法律賦予公司將其董事、高級管理人員等 違反忠實義務的所得歸為公司所有的一項特殊救濟權利。公司歸入權作為一種新式債權,目前尚存在許多立法 漏洞。《中華人民共和國公司法》第148條和《中華人民共和國證券法》第44條之間存在着內容矛盾之處,應將 本公司及其涉案關聯公司的董事會、監事會和符合一定條件的股東明確作為歸入權的主體,同時將監事和“受 益所有人”納入歸入權行使對象,並完善股東派生訴訟制度。另外,歸入權糾紛在實務中主要集中於奪取商業 機會和競業禁止兩大類,應分別採取“四要件+經營範圍標準+公平標準”和“實質主義”審查標準進行認定。 最後,基於損害賠償請求權對歸入權的補充作用,當二者發生競合時,採用“單一模式為原則,重疊模式為例 外”的規則對公司進行救濟。 |
英文摘要 | Disgorgement comes from the common law theory of “constructive trust,” which is a special remedial right given by law to the company to revert the proceeds of its directors and officers who violate the duty of loyalty to the company. As a new type of creditor’s rights, there are still many legislative loopholes in the company’s right of disgorgement. There are contradictions between Article 148 of the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China and Article 44 of the Securities Law of the People’s Republic of China. The board of directors, the supervisory board and the shareholders who meet certain conditions of the company and its affiliates involved in the case should be clearly regarded as the subject of the right of disgorgement, and the supervisors and “beneficial owners” should be included in the object of the right of disgorgement, and the shareholder representative action should be improved. In addition, the company’s board of directors, supervisory committee and shareholders are clearly defined as the subjects of the right of incorporation. In addition, in practice, disputes over the right of disgorgement are mainly focused on two categories, namely, taking business opportunities and non-competition, which should be determined by the “four elements + business scope standard + fairness standard” and “substantialism” respectively. Finally, based on the complementary role of the right to claim damages to the right of disgorgement, the rule of “single model as the principle and overlapping model as the exception” is adopted to provide remedies to companies when they compete with each other. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。