查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Intracorporeal versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis Following Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: Short Term Clinical Outcomes
- 大腸癌手術的現況
- Effect of Vitamin E on Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase Activity in Colon Cancer Tissues
- Adenocarcinoma of the Colon Presenting with a Sister Mary Joseph's Nodule (Umbilical Metastasis)--Case Report
- Effect of 5-Fluorouracil on N-Acetyltransferase Activity in Colon Cancer Tissues
- 大腸癌的最近發展
- N-Acetyltransferase Activity and 2-Aminofluorene-DNA Adducts Formation in Human Colon Cancer
- 多發大腸癌之後視力喪失及右肢無力
- 大腸癌之肝臟轉移的手術治療
- Biliary Papillomatosis and Colon Cancer: A Case Report
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Intracorporeal versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis Following Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: Short Term Clinical Outcomes=大腸癌腹腔鏡右側大腸切除術,體內吻合與體外吻合比較:短期術後預後經驗分享 |
---|---|
作 者 | 林偉傑; 黃玄遠; 陳志誠; 王愷晟; 張譽耀; | 書刊名 | 中華民國大腸直腸外科醫學會雜誌 |
卷 期 | 30:1 2019.03[民108.03] |
頁 次 | 頁21-27 |
分類號 | 416.245 |
關鍵詞 | 腹腔鏡右側大腸切除術; 體內吻合; 大腸癌; Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy; Intracorporeal anastomosis; Colon cancer; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 目的:在單一醫學中心大腸癌腹腔鏡右側大腸切除術,體內吻合與體外吻合術中與術後預後比較。方法:自2017年1月至2018年3月2大腸癌阻塞患者接受腹腔鏡右側大腸切除手術的回顧性研究。結果:共78位患者納入研究,22位施行體內吻合,56位施行體外吻合。在平均手術時間體內吻合組比體外吻合組短(143.4 ± 29分鐘比160.89 ± 36.4分鐘,p=0.048),術中失血量也相對比較少(34 ± 18ml比45.1 ± 27.3ml,p=0.086)。在術中淋巴結摘除,術後併發症,吻合處滲漏則兩組沒有差異。結論:體內吻合來施行大腸癌腹腔鏡右側大腸切除術是有功效和安全的。 |
英文摘要 | Purpose. The aim of this study was to compare intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRHC) performed with intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) with those of LRHC performed with extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) in a single medical institution. Methods. The following data from our institution-maintained database were reviewed to identify patients with colon cancer who underwent LRHC during January 2017 to March 2018: demographic and disease-related characteristics, pTNM stage, intraoperative outcomes (operative time, blood loss, and number of harvested lymph nodes), and postoperative outcomes (postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, and total number of days of hospital stay). Results. A total of 78 patients were identified, of whom 22 underwent LRHC with ICA and the remaining 56 underwent LRHC with ECA. There was no significant difference in patient demographic and disease-related characteristics. Mean operative time was shorter in the ICA group than in the ECA group (143.4 vs. 160.89 min, p = 0.048); mean measured blood loss was also lesser in the ICA group than in the ECA group (34 vs. 45.1 ml, p = 0.086). No significant difference was detected in terms of the number of harvested lymph nodes, postoperative complication rate, and anastomotic leakage rate. Conclusion. Using an ICA approach in performing LRHC is safe and results in a shorter operative time. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。