查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | Labeling and Argument Doubling in Japanese=詞組標籤理論和日語論元重複現象 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 齋藤衛; | 書刊名 | 清華學報 |
| 卷 期 | 47:2 2017.06[民106.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁383-405 |
| 分類號 | 801.4 |
| 關鍵詞 | 論元重複; 自由合併; 詞組標籤; 論旨準則; 焦點; 另類選項集合; Argument doubling; Free merge; Labeling; The θ-criterion; Focus; Set of alternatives; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文以 Chomsky (2013) 的詞組標籤運算 (labeling algorithm) 為基準,探討論旨準則 (θ-criterion) 在當代句法理論中的必要性。本文從英語出發,指出句法理論中詞組標記系統與論旨準則的功能有所重疊:經由討論日語論元重複 (argument doubling) 結構,我們發現論旨準則在語料實證上確有不足。這顯示論旨準則應從當代句法理論中剔除,由標籤運算取代其功能。 |
| 英文摘要 | Chomsky’s (2013) labeling algorithm plays a fundamental role in the pursuit of minimalist syntax, restricting the structures that free Merge generates. I suggest that it also explains the effects of the θ-criterion to the extent that they are correct. This leads to the conclusion that the θ-criterion, as it is currently formulated, should be dispensed with. I first note that the θ-criterion and the labeling algorithm overlap in their effects in English. Then, I introduce the labeling mechanism for Japanese that I argued for in Saito (2014). It assumes that the language lacks φ-feature agreement altogether and claims that suffixal Case serves to aid labeling. With this background, I discuss examples of argument doubling from Kuroda (1988), where a verb assigns a single θrole to two distinct arguments. I show that these and other similar examples are successful with labeling but violate the θ-criterion. Their grammaticality demonstrates then that the θ-criterion should be eliminated in favor of labeling. At the end, I examine the conditions on argument doubling and suggest that one of the doubled arguments must be construed as a focus and the other must serve to specify the set of alternatives for the focus in the sense of Rooth (1992). Based on this, I speculate that though the θ-criterion is untenable, Full Interpretation requires that each constituent play a unique role in the semantics. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。