查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 國小一年級學生解題學習促進導向動態評量設計之補救教學應用研究
- 國小數學文字題解題學習策略量表之編製發展與實測分析研究
- 多階段動態評量對國小學生數學學習促進與補救效益之分析研究
- 從鷹架教學中介觀點探討動態評量在促進及評估個體學習潛能上之基礎與設計
- 多階段動態評量在現行國小課程數學文字題單元教學中之應用效益探析
- 歷程導向設計及學習策略中介教導對個體不同層次數學解題學習潛能開展效益影響之動態評量研究
- 開展個體數學解題檢核能力之動態評量研究
- 鷹架個體數學解題與遷移學習潛能延展性之動態評量研究
- 應用多階段動態評量發展國小數學文字題解題補救教學模式之效益分析研究
- 不同策略教學及鷹架中介設計對個體數學文字題解題學習潛能開展效益影響之動態評量研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國小一年級學生解題學習促進導向動態評量設計之補救教學應用研究=The Effects of Learning Facilitation Oriented Dynamic Assessment Applied in Word Problem Solving Remedial Teaching for First Graders |
---|---|
作 者 | 許家驊; | 書刊名 | 人文社會科學研究. 教育類 |
卷 期 | 10:4 2016.12[民105.12] |
頁 次 | 頁1-30 |
分類號 | 523.33 |
關鍵詞 | 可能發展區間; 解題學習促進; 解題學習評量; 解題學習策略; 解題學習遷移; Learning assessment in mathematical problem solving; MPS; Learning facilitation in MPS; Learning strategy in MPS; Learning transfer in MPS; Zone of proximal development; ZPD; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討解題學習促進導向動態評量補救教學應用設計對個體解題學習效益之影響。係針對未達75%解題學習精熟水準之國小一年級學生,採歷程導向促進(歷程及非歷程)與學習策略教導(認知整合後設認知及歸因、認知整合歸因、認知)二因子2×3 變異數實驗及追蹤設計進行,其不同向度(現有、遷移、遷移追蹤)表現,因子間無交互作用,然歷程導向促進優於他者且利於解題及遷移,認知整合後設認知及歸因策略優於餘二者且利於解題,各組內處理前後表現均具進展並具大幅效果值及關聯強度。故採歷程導向促進、認知整合後設認知及歸因策略設計,其促進效益優於其他。此外促進後量數對解題遷移追蹤表現具預測效益,且於排除解題運作記憶及自我調節影響後更趨明顯。 |
英文摘要 | The author wanted to explore the remedial effects of learning facilitation oriented dynamic assessment in word problem solving (WPS) for the first graders under 75% mastery performance by the ANOVA 2×3 factorial experimental design. The results indicated that there were no factor interaction effects, but main effects were found. It was same in simple gain scores, deferred gain scores and transfer performances on process-oriented facilitation (POF), but learning strategies instruction (LSI) were effective except transfer performances. The effects of POF were better than its counterpart both on solving and transfer scores, and the effects of cognitive integrated metacognitive with attribution (CMA) strategy instruction were better than others on solving scores but were not different on the scores of cognitive integrated attribution and cognitive strategy instruction. In addition, the posttesting performances of all treatment groups were better than pretesting by each other. So, the remedial and mediated effects were better than all for POF and CMA. Finally, the interrelationships of correlation and regression prediction were found among the performances of solving, and trandfer, with follow-up transfer. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。