查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 自最高法院100年度臺上字第74號民事判決論商業照管義務暨適航性之區分
- 海商法第63條規定是否為主張免責與單位限責之前提要件--評臺灣高等法院111年度保險上更一字第2號民事判決
- 論航海過失免責事項之存廢
- 鹿特丹規則就託運人義務與責任規定之研究--以危險貨物為中心
- 海上運送人法定免責事由之研究--以國際海上運送公約為中心
- 適航性之研究
- 從船員之配置論適航性--兼評臺灣高雄地方法院99年度海商字第4號民事判決
- 海上貨櫃運送人強制責任事由之研究--以德國法為中心
- 航管過失與船員適航性之交錯--兼評臺灣高等法院高雄分院一百年度海商上字第六號民事判決
- 馮京VS馬涼--論電報放貨通知是否為學理上之海上貨運單
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 自最高法院100年度臺上字第74號民事判決論商業照管義務暨適航性之區分=A Study on the Differences between the Duty to Care for Cargo and Seaworthiness--Relevant to the Supreme Court Civil Judgement Tai Shan Tsu No. 74 (2012) |
---|---|
作 者 | 羅俊瑋; | 書刊名 | 高大法學論叢 |
卷 期 | 10:2 2015.03[民104.03] |
頁 次 | 頁123-159+161-166 |
分類號 | 585.441 |
關鍵詞 | 適航性; 海牙規則; 漢堡規則; 鹿特丹規則; 貨櫃; 商業照管義務; 契約自由; Seaworthiness; Hague Rules; Hamburg Rules; Rotterdam Rules; Container; Duty of custody of the cargo; Freedom of contract; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 維持船舶適航性為海上運送人首要義務,運送人應盡其謹慎注意義務達成適航性要求,其為運送人主張責任限制或免責事由之前提。由聯合國通過之鹿特丹規則改變海牙規則、海牙威士比規則暨我國海商法於發航前或發航時盡適航性之相對性義務,而將之擴展至全程運送,並特別明訂由運送人提供裝載貨物之貨櫃,亦有適航性之要求。我國海商法第62條第1項第3款:「運送人或船舶所有人於發航前及發航時,對於下列事項,應為必要之注意及措置:…三、使貨艙、冷藏室及其他供載運貨物部分適合於受載、運送與保存。」為適航性有關適貨性之規定。同法第63條規定:「運送人對於承運貨物之裝載、卸載、搬移、堆存、保管、運送及看守,應為必要之注意及處置。」為運送人對貨物之商業照管義務規定。我國最高法院100年度台上字第74號民事判決認為海商法第63條規定為適航性中之適貨性規定,其對適航性認知是否有誤,本文即就此加以討論。 |
英文摘要 | To make and keep the ship seaworthy is the overriding obligation for the ocean carrier. The carrier should meet the request of seaworthiness before asserting the limitation and exemption of his liability for cargo damage or loss. The carrier should pay due diligence in the whole period under Rotterdam Rules. The rules legislated by Rotterdam Rules was a substitute for the rules to pay due diligence before and at the beginning of the voyage in the Hague-Visby Rules and R.O.C. Maritime Act. To make and keep any container supplied by the carrier in or upon which the goods are carried, fit and safe for their reception, carriage and preservation also should fulfill the request of seaworthiness stated in Art. 62 (1) III of R.O.C. Maritime Act stipulated that "The carrier or ship owner shall be bound before and at the time of the commencement of the voyage, to exercise due diligence to…3. make the holds, refrigeration and cooling chambers, and all other parts of the ship used to carry the cargo, fit and safe for reception, carriage and preservation." Section 3 is for cargo worthy. In addition, Art.63 of R.O.C. Maritime Act stipulated: "The carrier shall exercise due diligence to properly and carefully load, discharge, handle, stow, care for, carry and keep the cargo carried." It is the duty of custody of the cargo. R.O.C Civil Judgment Tai Shan Tsu No. 74 (Sup. Ct., 2011) wrongly stated that carrier's due diligence to make cargo worthiness is stipulated in Article 63 of R.O.C. Maritime Act and that is the precondition component for the exemption clauses in the Article 69. In fact, to make cargo worthiness is stipulated in Art. 62 (3) of R.O.C. Maritime Act. Art. 63 of Maritime Act was made for the duty of custody of the cargo. We will have more discussions on these relevant issues. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。