查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 同儕回饋策略對籃球技能學習成效之探討
- Comparisons of Student Perceptions and Evaluations of Using Wiki to Conduct Online Peer Response: An Interschool Project
- JFL必修作文授業のピア.レスポンスにおける学生のスタンス
- Understanding the Importance of Collaborative Language Learning Process in Adult ESOL Classes
- 合作學習對國小體育教學影響之研究
- 合作學習、解釋及發問架構提示對歸納推理表現之影響
- Use Cooperative Learning to Promote Students' Learning and Social Skills
- WWW上智慧型合作學習環境之研究:一個全球氣候歸納探索學習環境
- 傳統教學法與合作學習教學法在籃球投籃教學效果之探討
- 電腦中介溝通與合作學習
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 同儕回饋策略對籃球技能學習成效之探討=The Effect of Peer Interpersonal Feedback Strategy on Basketball Skills Learning |
---|---|
作 者 | 高俊傑; 游能揚; 羅玉枝; | 書刊名 | 運動與健康研究 |
卷 期 | 2:2 2013.04[民102.04] |
頁 次 | 頁96-108 |
分類號 | 993.34 |
關鍵詞 | 同儕回饋; 合作學習; 籃球技能; Peer interpersonal feedback; Cooperative learning; Basketball skills; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目的:本研究之主要目的在探討合作學習之同儕回饋策略對籃球技能學習成效表現的影響。方法:本研究係以桃園縣某所大學三年級,共131名選修籃球課程之學生為研究對象,以班級型態進行準實驗設計教學,設合作學習實驗組與傳統教學控制組,實驗組與控制組依籃球技能前測之成績區分為高、中、低三種能力水準。本實驗教學每週兩節課,共計100分鐘,共安排8週教學實驗介入。以籃球技能檢測為本研究之工具,所得之資料以描述統計、t檢定及單因子變異數分析等方法進行分析。結果:一、在籃球技能運球表現方面,實驗組顯著優於控制組且達著差異(t=3.79, p<.05)。二、在籃球技能投籃表現部分,實驗組顯著優於控制組且達著差異(t=2.10, p<.05)。三、在不同能力水準學生籃球技能檢定表現方面方面,高能力組在籃球技能檢定運球及投籃的表現上皆顯著優於低能力組。結論:合作學習之同儕回饋策略能有效提昇籃球技能學習之效益,高能力族群學生更在透過教導同儕的主動學習過程中,對其所學習的技能表現較優於低能力學生族群。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to investigate how the peer interpersonal feedback strategy of cooperative learning affects the performance in basketball skills learning. We took 131 junior students of one university in Taoyuan County who selected basketball course as objects in this study and proceeded quasi-experimental designs lecturing with the division by class. We set the cooperative learning as experimental group and the traditional lecturing as control group. There were three levels; high, medium, low which were differentiated by the pre-test grades of basketball skills in both groups. The experimental lecturing included 2 periods in a week which was totally 100 minutes and eight-week of experimental lecturing was carried. We used the test of basketball skills as research tool and analyzed the collected data with descriptive statistics, T-test and One-Way ANOVA.1.The experimental group is significantly better than control group in dribbling skill, and reached the significance (t=3.79, p<.05) 2.The experimental group is significantly better than control group in shooting skill, and reached the significance (t=2.10, p<.05) 3. Among different levels of students' basketball skills testing performance, the highly skilled group is significantly better than lowly skilled group in both dribbling and shooting skills. We found that peer interpersonal feedback strategy of cooperative learning can effectively enhance the performance of basketball skills learning. Furthermore, the students in highly skilled level were better performed in those skills learning than the students in lowly skilled level by spontaneously learning and assisting their classmates. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。