查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 學習障礙學生在魏氏兒童智力量表上顯現之特質研究
- 學習障礙學生在魏氏兒童智力量表第四版(WISC-IV)表現之研究
- 魏氏兒童智力量表第三版(WISC-Ⅲ)對學習障礙學生的診斷功能之探析
- WISC-IV 結果解釋分析與應用:以ADHD/LD 個案為例
- 國小原住民學習障礙兒童與非原住民學習障礙兒童在魏氏兒童智力量表的表現分析
- 國民中小學學習障礙學生在魏氏兒童智力量表三版(WISC-III)表現特徵研究
- 國小注意力缺陷過動症學生、學習障礙伴隨注意力缺陷過動症問題學生與一般學生在魏氏兒童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)表現差異之探討
- 從「聰明的笨蛋」一書看學習障礙的教學
- WISC-Ⅲ在臺灣臨床上之適用性探討
- 老年之學習行為與學習障礙初探
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 學習障礙學生在魏氏兒童智力量表第四版(WISC-IV)表現之研究=A Study on WISC-IV Performance of Students with Learning Disabilities |
---|---|
作者 | 簡吟文; 謝佳燕; 孟瑛如; | 書刊名 | 課程與教學 |
卷期 | 17:4 2014.10[民103.10] |
頁次 | 頁229-255 |
分類號 | 529.69 |
關鍵詞 | 學習障礙; 魏氏兒童智力量表; Learning disabilities; WISC-IV; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討學障學生與一般學生在WISC-IV表現之差異,本研究之對象為404位學障學生,以描述性統計、t檢定進行分析,以瞭解學障學生與一般學生在WISC-IV的表現特質以及表現差異。本研究結果如下:一、各分測驗得分表現,一般學生得分較為平均,而學障學生則落差範圍較大。在學障學生中有2.72%的樣本符合由算術(AR)、符號替代(CD)、詞彙(VC)以及符號尋找(SS)為分測驗最低分之ACVS組型;至於部分ACVS組型則有7.18%符合。二、歷程分數表現,學障學生在CAR得分最高,最低是DSB,且七項歷程分數皆低於常模平均。三、學障學生在各指數分數間差距表現上,以VCI-PRI顯著百分比為最高,而WMI-PSI顯著百分比最低。四、在指數分數上,學障學生以PRI的平均得分為最高,最低的則是PSI。 |
英文摘要 | The major purposes of the study were to investigate the different characteristics of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children- Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) between students with learning disabilities and normal students. The subjects of Students with Learning Disabilities were 404. Frequency distribution & t-test were used to analyze the valid data in the paper. The major findings of this study were as follows: 1. The performance of the score, the normal student's scores were more equal than the students with learning disabilities. Students with learning disabilities in 2.72% of the sample in line with "ACVS (AR, CD, VC, SS)"; as "part of the ACVS group type" were 7.18% of the samples comply. 2. The performance of the processing score, learning disabilities students who got the highest scores at CAR, and the lowest scores at DSB got scores lower than normal average.3. The difference performance of index scores with learning disabilities, there was the highest significantly percentage in VCI to PRI, and the lowest significantly percentage in PRI to WMI. 4. The research results of index scores, learning disabilities students who got the highest scores at PRI, and the lowest scores at PSI. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。