查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 感覺統合異常對功能性構音障礙幼兒語言治療療效之影響
- 喪親者之團體心理治療--一位傷慟者領悟歷程
- 腸病毒之中醫療效
- 如何評估另類療法之臨床療效
- Comparison of Once Daily Cefpodoxime Proxetil Suspension and Thrice Daily Cefaclor Suspension in the Treatment of Acute Otitis Media in Children
- Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Higher Dose Amphotericin B Monotherapy for Cryptococcal Meningitis in Patients with Advanced HIV Infection
- 廣泛性焦慮症患者Buspirone, Lorazepam與Diazepam治療雙盲試驗
- Morbidity and Outcome in Dantrolene Treatment of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
- D.O.Q.I--PD Adequacy簡介
- A Comparative Study of Urokinase and Heparin in the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 感覺統合異常對功能性構音障礙幼兒語言治療療效之影響=Sensory Integration Dysfunction Affects Effectiveness of Speech Therapy on Children with Functional Articulation Disorders |
---|---|
作 者 | 董莉貞; 胡靜宜; 林巾凱; 謝清麟; 蘇炯睿; 陳璟綺; | 書刊名 | 臺灣復健醫學雜誌 |
卷 期 | 41:1 2013.03[民102.03] |
頁 次 | 頁31-38 |
分類號 | 416.896、416.896 |
關鍵詞 | 功能性構音障礙; 感覺統合失調; 療效; Functional articulation disorders; Sensory integration dysfunction; Effectiveness; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目的:探討功能性構音障礙(functional articulation disorders)幼兒,若合併感覺統合失調(sensory integration dysfunction),是否影響語言治療之成效?方法:20位學齡前幼兒分入感覺統合正常及異常兩組,每組各10人。治療介入前、後以詞語正確率及聲母正確率評估構音情況,另以口腔動作分量表(Riley motor problems inventory oral motor tasks)評估口腔動作功能,另於矯正目標完成時記錄其治療總次數。結果:兩組在月齡、性別、前測詞語正確率及聲母正確率之差異皆未達顯著水準(p值分別為0.837,0.639,0.324,0.441)。治療前、後詞語正確率及聲母正確率平均數差異檢定,組內p值≤0.001,組間p值為0.933及0.795。感覺統合異常組口腔動作分量表的口腔動作分數及治療總次數平均值皆大於正常組,相關性分析顯示治療次數與構音障礙程度及口腔動作協調能力與構音障礙程度有顯著負相關(rho=-0.577, -0.645及-0.799, -0.714)。結論:兩組接受語言治療介入後,構音情況皆有顯著改善,唯感覺統合異常組治療後之構音改善情況,相較於正常組略顯緩慢,未來仍需進一步研究以實證感覺統合失調影響學習成效之假說。 |
英文摘要 | Purpose: To compare the efficacy of speech therapy on children with functional articulation disorder with and without sensory integration dysfunction. Method: 20 young children were divided into two groups, those without sensory integration dysfunction (normal group, 10 children) and those with it (abnormal group, 10 children). The Mandarin Consonant Articulation Test for Preschool Children was administered on the children before and after therapy for articulation function. The oral motor function was evaluated by the Riley Motor Problems Inventory Oral Motor Tasks. Total of treatment sessions was recorded after the therapy. Results: Differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, and the percentage of correct consonant before therapy were not statistically significant (p≥0.324). An analysis of repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare the percentage of correct consonant before and after therapy between both groups. Results showed a within group difference (p≤0.001) and no significant differences between groups (p=0.933, 0.795). It was noted that the oral motor scores and total treatment sessions of the abnormal group were higher than those of the normal group. The Spearman Correlation Coefficient analysis showed the number of treatment sessions VS the percentage of correction in pronunciation and oral motor coordination VS the percentage of correction in pronunciation had significant negative correlation (rho=-0.577, -0.645, p<0.05 and -0.799, -0.714, p<0.001). Conclusion: The improvement in pronunciation in the sensory integration dysfunction group was slower than in the normal group after speech therapy. It needs further study to support the theory that sensory integration dysfunction affects the efficacy of speech therapy. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。