頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 漢賦與經學關係述評=A study on Fu and Confucian Classic in Han Dynasty : Bookreview |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳儀鳳; | 書刊名 | 經學研究集刊 |
卷 期 | 11 2011.10[民100.10] |
頁 次 | 頁145-155 |
分類號 | 820.9021 |
關鍵詞 | 漢賦經學; 意識型態; 文化霸權; 權力話語禮樂制度; 漢代士人; Han fu; Confucian Classics; Ideology; Cultural hegemony; Power and discourse; Ritual system; Scholars of the Han Dynast; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 漢代在文學發展上賦是最具代表性的文體,同時,漢代也是經學確立和昌盛的時代。因此,漢賦與經學二者間有著共同滋長的時代背景和社會風氣,二者間存在一定的關係和聯繫。由於漢賦與經學的關係涉及的層面十分廣泛,近年來也有兩本專著對此議題進行了探討,如胡學常《文學話語與權力話語:漢賦與兩漢政治》(杭州:浙江人民出版社,2000 年)與馮良方《漢賦與經學》(北京:中國社會科學出版社,2004 年)。本文擬由前述胡學常及馮良方這兩本專書出發,對其中討論漢賦與經學關係的論述做一番觀察,並試圖從中對漢賦與經學的關係進行相關的探討與反思。 胡學常《文學話語與權力話語:漢賦與兩漢政治》與馮良方《漢賦與經學》此二書中可以看出作者在其意識型態深處仍對經學抱持著負面的態度,而這樣的觀念其實可以追溯自中國大陸長期以來對經學所抱持的負面態度而來。這與中國共產黨自從毛澤東延安文藝政策講話以來對孔學的批判有關,又經歷文革等長時期的深刻影響。因此,胡、馮二人將經學視為一種文化霸權和定於一尊,束縛士人心靈等這樣的觀點,顯然其來有自。經學是否真如其所言這樣?似乎也還有可以討論的空間。 |
英文摘要 | In the development of the Han Dynasty’s literature, fu is considered the most representative genre; in the meanwhile, the Han Dynasty is also regarded as the age when Confucian Classics were established and flourishing. Therefore, the Han fu and Confucian Classics were developed under the same historical background as well as social conduct; hence, certain relations and connections must exist between them. Due to the fact that their relations are concerned with various aspects, in recent years, there are two works that have probed into the topic at hand. Namely, Hu Xuechang’s “文學話語與權力話語:漢賦與兩漢政治”(杭州:浙江人民出版社,2000 年)and Feng Liangfang’s “漢賦與經學”(北京:中國社會科學出版社,2004 年). This paper will be based on Hu Xuechang and Feng Liangfang’s two works mentioned above; the discussions of the relations of Han fu and Confucian Classics shall be observed, with an attempt to explore and introspect the relations between Han fu and Confucian Classics through the process. From Hu Xuechang’s “文學話語與權力話語:漢賦與兩漢政治” and Feng Liangfang’s “漢賦與經學,”we can see that in the authors’ deep ideology, Confucian Classics is still treated with a negative attitude. This notion can be traced back to China’s negative attitude towards Confucian Classics for quite some time. This is connected with the criticism against Confucius by the Communist Party of China since the talks at the Yan’an forum on Literature and Art conducted by Mao Zedong and also the profound effect of the long-term Cultural Revolution. Therefore, Hu and Feng’s view of Confucian Classics as a kind of Cultural Hegemony that has constraints on scholars evidently has a reason. Are Confucian Classics really as how they are described? There seems to be space for more discussion on the current issue. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。